A comprehensive list of research resources to help you make an informed decision on concent
The C/V Vax is being distributed in every city in the US. I want to take the time to remind you all to PLEASE report ANY reactions you experience post vaxine via the VAERS reporting system.
Medical professionals are supposed to report all adverse events *BY LAW*, but Harvard researchers were hired by the CDC to analyze the reporting to VAERS(Vaxine Adverse Event Reporting System, the passive surveillance system established to monitor vaxine injury/death). Their preliminary findings were that less than 1% of vaxine reactions are ever reported. After this was relayed to the CDC, all correspondence halted and the project was left to be forgotten. https://cfvsa.org/less_than_1/
Medical professionals are not the the only people who can report to VAERS, though. We, the people, can report for ourselves too.. and I highly encourage you to do so if you experience a reaction of any kind.
Instructions for reporting👉🏻 https://vaers.hhs.gov/esubhelp.html
Reporting your adverse event👉🏻 https://vaers.hhs.gov/reportevent.html
Bear in mind that the following are all valid reactions post vaxination:
•fever
•redness, swelling, or heat at the injection site
•fatigue, malaise, or lethargy
•dizziness or vertigo
•vomiting
•diarrhea
•Incontinence
•sudden onset of rashes
•headaches
•body aches
•C/V symptoms
The following text are not my words.
"Pfizer’s 53 page C/V vaxine document released today. It DOES NOT prevent C/V infection or spread of the disease. Masks and social-distancing are still required.
Please note on Page 2 below that of the 3410 individuals who got C/V during the study, almost half were from the vaxinated group. The vaxine did not prevent infection!
Below is the working list from the FDA for the adverse effects they plan to monitor for after release of the c/v vaccine(s) with the link for you to confirm for yourself. https://www.fda.gov/media/143557/download
•Guillain-Barré syndrome
•Acute disseminated encephalomyelitis
•Transverse myelitis
•Encephalitis/myelitis/encephalomyelitis/
meningoencephalitis/meningitis/
encepholapathy
•Convulsions/seizures
•Stroke
•Narcolepsy and cataplexy
•Anaphylaxis
•Acute myocardial infarction
•Myocarditis/pericarditis
•Autoimmune disease
•Deaths
•Pregnancy and birth outcomes
•Other acute demyelinating diseases
•Non-anaphylactic allergic reactions
•Thrombocytopenia
•Disseminated intravascular coagulation
•Venous thromboembolism
•Arthritis and arthralgia/joint pain
•Kawasaki disease
•Multisystem Inflammatory Syndrome
in Children
•Vac xine enhanced disease
***If your eyes are opening to the insanity of this vac xine logic, please revisit the idea of childhood vac xines. Take a look at the infections, the treatments, the outcomes, the vac xine risks, etc.
For those looking for data on the Moderna C/V vac xine...
-45 participants age 18-55
-20 participants age 56-70
-20 participants age 71 or older
-Out of 193 potential participants, only 85 were deemed acceptable.
To be acceptable you can not have ANY MEDICAL condition, must have perfect BMI, and perfect blood pressure measurements. 56% of the people who applied were rejected.
Here's the results of the perfectly healthy ideal 85 people:
Age 18-55: 71% OF PARTICIPANTS HAD AN ADVERSE REACTION
Age 56-70: 50% OF PARTICIPANTS HAD AN ADVERSE REACTION
Age 71+: 70% OF PARTICIPANTS HAD AN ADVERSE REACTION
How on earth is the general population (the 56% rejected for not being healthy enough) supposed to get this?
https://www.fda.gov/media/144245/download"
-Kasey McInis Powell
THINK YOU HAD ALL BETTER READ THIS:
Pay attention:
"I'm not a conspiracy theorist, I have a PhD in computer science my partner has a PhD in Chemistry, based on research in the area of Biological Synthesis of Pharmaceutically Active Molecules
All of those considering taking, or being bribed into taking this vaccine, with the promise of freedoms restored that you already had and have conceded...
1) You do realise this is not a normal vaccine, yes?
2) You recognise that this permanently and irreversibly changes your DNA?
3) You fully understand that this has never been done before in the history of mankind and there is not a single person on this planet who truly knows what the outcome is?
4) You are totally aware, that if anything does go wrong, you have no come back and cannot be treated?
Just checking you know what I know, Also if you still think Covid is real and very dangerous then ask yourself these questions;
Why are GP's not isolating? dying?
Why are frontline staff not isolating? dying?
Why are police officers not isolating? dying?
Why are soldiers not isolating? dying?
Why are bus drivers not isolating? dying?
Why are most hospitals empty?
Why are testing centres empty?
Why is it that 96% of people testing positive are mask wearers?
Why is it bacterial pneumonia is on the rise because of mask wearing? Yet it's kept hush hush.
Why is it that large conglomerates can stay open whilst small businesses of the same industry are bullied into shutting?
Why is it that the BBC was funded by Bill Gates to peddle pro Covid propaganda?
Why is it that the biggest censorship campaign is now in force?
Why is it that if you even question the narrative you believe the earth is flat and that lizard people exist?
Why is it that the 'Great Reset' is being openly advertised yet people still deny it?
Why is it that in Wuhan people were dropping dead in the streets yet it's happening nowhere else?
Why is it that the mainstream media are using crisis actors and dummies to peddle fear?
Why is it that our police force has undergone a huge militarisation?
Why has police brutality skyrocketed?
Why are the fact-check websites funded by the same elites that are funding the media for pro covid propaganda?
Why is Google blacklisting well documented science that disproves all this pro covid science?
Why is Google blacklisting anything that questions the narrative?
If this virus was so deadly then why;
Would you need a test to tell you that you've got it?
Why are graveyards and crematoriums not overflowing?
Why are hospitals not overwhelmed to the point of everything else is fully cancelled?
Why are people not dropping dead like in Wuhan?
Why do you need an app to tell you to isolate?
Why has China gone back to 'normal' without a vaccine?
Why has Covid-19 never been isolated?
"Hell on earth is looking in the mirror and wondering what could of been"
The next stage of the Covid1984 Operation is to "deploy" the vaccine amongst the public.
The "authorities" know that a lot of people who accept the lockdown measures and who accept wearing masks to "protect the common good" are unhappy about having rushed vaccine injected into them.
So to deter them the media is now in over drive to portray those with reservations as "dangerous anti-vaxxers". Despite the fact that a lot of people with reservations are not anti vax, not anti science, not anti medicine or pharmacetical drugs. They're just anti not having a choice about whether to have this vaccine or not.
By labelling all Covid Vacine hesitant or refusers as crazed anti science conpiracy theorists it creates an US vs Them dialectic that will then be used to create a conflict where those who say no to the vaccine will be blamed by those content to roll up their sleeves and have it for preventing the country from moving out of rolling lockdowns and "back to normal".
Articles like this are programming the minds of people in society to "choose a side" which can then be pitted against each other and via the divide and rule technique ultimately control us all. How about we respect one another's right to choose what we do with our own bodies and decide for ourselves whether we have the vaccine or not rather than force one another's choice on the other instead?
They are called "our own bodies" for a reason.... we own our own bodies. Our bodies are our property and as such no one else has the right to tell us what we should put in or on our bodies. Those claiming that right are saying in not so many words that they own us and have the right to control us against our wishes as that is....slavery.
So ‘Moderna’ have come out with a better vaccine which is 95% effective ....
Remember my prediction back in April? I said out of hundreds of companies across the world, Moderna will be the ones who bring this vaccine to market!! 📷 How do we know this? 📷
Because it’s all planned!! Moderna have NEVER brought a human vaccine to market before, they are also using RNA which has NEVER been used in vaccines before and they were bailed out of bankruptcy in 2010 by wait for it Dr Fauci and Gates!! (Year might be wrong but it’s close)
Shall I tell you why I think they’ve never brought a human vaccine to market b4. I think it’s because they never planned too, look at their name ‘MOD e RNA’ they specialise in modifying DNA by using RNA!
They have been waiting for this moment for years!!! The time has come ... no one knows what the side effects will be after a few years (I have my own idea what will happen when you mix a virus with human dna but I’ll leave it there for now)
Please just look things up for yourself, start with the history and set up of the MSM because knowing they’re lying to you is step 1.
Things are going to be hard for the ones who don’t accept this vaccine but no one should sell their soul to the devil (literally)."
Keep safe people!
Dr. Wesley A Kitikonti
Dear Patients and Friends,
Last week I must have been asked 20 times about the new COVID vaccines. Here are my thoughts. Please pass this information onto many as you can. People need to have fully informed consent when it comes to injecting foreign genetic material into their bodies.
1. The COVID vaccines are mRNA vaccines. mRNA vaccines are a completely new type of vaccine. No mRNA vaccine has ever been licensed for human use before. In essence, we have absolutely no idea what to expect from this vaccine. We have no idea if it will be effective or safe.
2. Traditional vaccine simply introduce pieces of a virus to stimulate an immune reaction. The new mRNA vaccine is completely different. It actually injects (transfects) molecules of synthetic genetic material from non-humans sources into our cells. Once in the cells, the genetic material interacts with our transfer RNA (tRNA) to make a foreign protein that supposedly teaches the body to destroy the virus being coded for. Note that these newly created proteins are not regulated by our own DNA, and are thus completely foreign to our cells. What they are fully capable of doing is unknown.
3. The mRNA molecule is vulnerable to destruction. So, in order to protect the fragile mRNA strands while they are being inserted into our DNA they are coated with PEGylated lipid nanoparticles. This coating hides the mRNA from our immune system which ordinarily would kill any foreign material injected into the body. PEGylated lipid nanoparticles have been used in several different drugs for years. Because of their effect on immune system balance, several studies have shown them to induce allergies and autoimmune diseases. Additionally, PEGylated lipid nanoparticles have been shown to trigger their own immune reactions, and to cause damage to the liver.
4. These new vaccines are additionally contaminated with aluminum, mercury, and possibly formaldehyde. The manufacturers have not yet disclosed what other toxins they contain.
5. Since viruses mutate frequently, the chance of any vaccine working for more than a year is unlikely. That is why the flu vaccine changes every year. Last year’s vaccine is no more valuable than last year’s newspaper.
6. Absolutely no long term safety studies will have been done to ensure that any of these vaccines don’t cause the cancer, seizures, heart disease, allergies, and autoimmune diseases seen with other vaccines. If you ever wanted to be guinea pig for Big Pharma, now is your golden opportunity.
7. Many experts question whether the mRNA technology is ready for prime time. In November 2020, Dr. Peter Jay Hotez said of the new mRNA vaccines, "I worry about innovation at the expense of practicality because they [the mRNA vaccines] are weighted toward technology platforms that have never made it to licensure before.” Dr. Hotez is Professor of Pediatrics and Molecular Virology & Microbiology at Baylor College of Medicine, where he is also Director of the Texas Children’s Hospital Center for Vaccine Development.
8. Michal Linial, PhD is a Professor of Biochemistry. Because of her research and forecasts on COVID-19, Dr. Linial has been widely quoted in the media. She recently stated, "I won't be taking it [the mRNA vaccine] immediately – probably not for at least the coming year. We have to wait and see whether it really works. We will have a safety profile for only a certain number of months, so if there is a long-term effect after two years, we cannot know."
9. In November 2020, The Washington Post reported on hesitancy among healthcare professionals in the United States to the mRNA vaccines, citing surveys which reported that: "some did not want to be in the first round, so they could wait and see if there are potential side effects", and that "doctors and nurses want more data before championing vaccines to end the pandemic".
10. Since the death rate from COVID resumed to the normal flu death rate way back in early September, the pandemic has been over since then. Therefore, at this point in time no vaccine is needed. The current scare tactics regarding “escalating cases” is based on a PCR test that because it exceeds 34 amplifications has a 100% false positive rate unless it is performed between the 3rd and 5th day after the first day of symptoms. It is therefor 100% inaccurate in people with no symptoms. This is well established in the scientific literature. See the attachment (False Positive PCR testing is up to 100%!) for more information on this. If you go to the CDC site (file:///C:/Users/docto/AppData/Local/Temp/cdc_97230_DS1.pdf ), you can see that the weekly death rates in the US are now lower than they normally are during an average flu season.
11. The other reason you don’t need a vaccine for COVID-19 is that substantial herd immunity has already taken place in the United States. This is the primary reason for the end of the pandemic.
12. Unfortunately, you cannot completely trust what you hear from the media. They have consistently got it wrong for the past year. Since they are all supported by Big Pharma and the other entities selling the COVID vaccines, they are not going to be fully forthcoming when it comes to mRNA vaccines. Every statement I have made here is fully backed by published scientific references.
13. I would be very interested to see verification that Bill and Melinda Gates with their entire family including grandchildren, Joe Biden and President Trump and their entire families, and Anthony Fauci and his entire family all get the vaccine.
14. Anyone who after reading all this still wants to get injected with the mRNA vaccine, should at the very least have their blood checked for COVID-19 antibodies. There is no need for a vaccine in persons already naturally immunized. Here's my bottom line: I would much rather get a COVID infection than get a COVID vaccine. That would be safer and more effective. I have had a number of COVID positive flu cases this year. Some were old and had health concerns. Every single one has done really well with natural therapies including ozone therapy and IV vitamin C. Just because modern medicine has no effective treatment for viral infections, doesn’t mean that there isn’t one.
Yours Always,
Frank Shallenberger, MD, HMD
"The shocking reason why Pfizer’s coronavirus vaccine requires storage at -70C … because it contains experimental nanotech components that have NEVER been used in vaccines before.
Pfizer’s new coronavirus vaccine requires storage at -70C (-94F), which is much colder than the North Pole. If it’s not stored at this temperature, its ingredients begin to break down and it fails to work. Currently Pfizer is claiming, without evidence, that its vaccine is “90% effective.” But this claim is little more than corporate propaganda designed to drive up stock prices through false projections.
But why do these vaccines need to be kept at -70C in the first place?
The answer, it turns out, is because they contain potentially hazardous ingredients that have never been used in vaccines before.
As Children’s Health Defense explained in an August 6th article, “mRNA vaccines undergoing Covid-19 clinical trials, including the Moderna vaccine, rely on a nanoparticle-based “carrier system” containing a synthetic chemical called polyethylene glycol (PEG).”
CHD goes on to explain:
The use of PEG in drugs and vaccines is increasingly controversial due to the well-documented incidence of adverse PEG-related immune reactions, including life-threatening anaphylaxis.
Roughly seven in ten Americans may already be sensitized to PEG, which may result in reduced efficacy of the vaccine and an increase in adverse side effects.
If a PEG-containing mRNA vaccine for Covid-19 gains FDA approval, the uptick in exposure to PEG will be unprecedented—and potentially disastrous.
Moderna documents and publications indicate that the company is well aware of safety risks associated with PEG and other aspects of its mRNA technology but is more concerned with its bottom line.
Lipid nanoparticles cause hyperinflammatory responses in the body, leading to severe reactions, hospitalization and potentially DEATH
Why are LNPs (Lipid Nanoparticles) used in these vaccines? As CHD further explains:
LNPs “encapsulate the mRNA constructs to protect them from degradation and promote cellular uptake” and, additionally, rev up the immune system (a property that vaccine scientists tamely describe as LNPs’ “inherent adjuvant properties”)
In other words, the LNPs are adjuvants, meaning they are designed to cause hyperinflammatory responses in human beings, once injected. This is done in an effort to induce the creation of antibodies that then allow the vaccine manufacturer to claim high “effectiveness” rates, even when those very same adjuvants cause severe adverse reactions.
According to recent vaccine trials conducted by Moderna, 100% of human subjects in the high-dose vaccine trial group experienced adverse reactions." Thanks, Tasha Clayton Dennis
Buyer beware!
“Breaking news! The UK's NHS has pivoted after just ONE DAY of vaccinating staff...
These people would be dead if it weren't for the epinephrine they were carrying.”
https://www.theguardian.com/world/2020/dec/09/pfizer-covid-vaccine-nhs-extreme-allergy-sufferers-regulators-reaction
(Via @HearThisWell)
The vaccine doesn't stop infection or transmission. May extend shedding for months.
https://theconversation.com/whats-the-difference-between-viral-shedding-and-reinfection-with-covid-19-150547
There are SO SO MANY people that are NOT SUPPOSED to get this, according to the manufacturer and governments BUT I haven't seen even one of those go public with it. I did...
https://www.bitchute.com/video/1InLihkV5coO/
The C/V Vax is being distributed in every city in the US. I want to take the time to remind you all to PLEASE report ANY reactions you experience post vaxine via the VAERS reporting system.
Medical professionals are supposed to report all adverse events *BY LAW*, but Harvard researchers were hired by the CDC to analyze the reporting to VAERS(Vaxine Adverse Event Reporting System, the passive surveillance system established to monitor vaxine injury/death). Their preliminary findings were that less than 1% of vaxine reactions are ever reported. After this was relayed to the CDC, all correspondence halted and the project was left to be forgotten. https://cfvsa.org/less_than_1/
Medical professionals are not the the only people who can report to VAERS, though. We, the people, can report for ourselves too.. and I highly encourage you to do so if you experience a reaction of any kind.
Instructions for reporting👉🏻 https://vaers.hhs.gov/esubhelp.html
Reporting your adverse event👉🏻 https://vaers.hhs.gov/reportevent.html
Bear in mind that the following are all valid reactions post vaxination:
•fever
•redness, swelling, or heat at the injection site
•fatigue, malaise, or lethargy
•dizziness or vertigo
•vomiting
•diarrhea
•Incontinence
•sudden onset of rashes
•headaches
•body aches
•C/V symptoms
The following text are not my words.
"Pfizer’s 53 page C/V vaxine document released today. It DOES NOT prevent C/V infection or spread of the disease. Masks and social-distancing are still required.
Please note on Page 2 below that of the 3410 individuals who got C/V during the study, almost half were from the vaxinated group. The vaxine did not prevent infection!
Below is the working list from the FDA for the adverse effects they plan to monitor for after release of the c/v vaccine(s) with the link for you to confirm for yourself. https://www.fda.gov/media/143557/download
•Guillain-Barré syndrome
•Acute disseminated encephalomyelitis
•Transverse myelitis
•Encephalitis/myelitis/encephalomyelitis/
meningoencephalitis/meningitis/
encepholapathy
•Convulsions/seizures
•Stroke
•Narcolepsy and cataplexy
•Anaphylaxis
•Acute myocardial infarction
•Myocarditis/pericarditis
•Autoimmune disease
•Deaths
•Pregnancy and birth outcomes
•Other acute demyelinating diseases
•Non-anaphylactic allergic reactions
•Thrombocytopenia
•Disseminated intravascular coagulation
•Venous thromboembolism
•Arthritis and arthralgia/joint pain
•Kawasaki disease
•Multisystem Inflammatory Syndrome
in Children
•Vac xine enhanced disease
***If your eyes are opening to the insanity of this vac xine logic, please revisit the idea of childhood vac xines. Take a look at the infections, the treatments, the outcomes, the vac xine risks, etc.
For those looking for data on the Moderna C/V vac xine...
-45 participants age 18-55
-20 participants age 56-70
-20 participants age 71 or older
-Out of 193 potential participants, only 85 were deemed acceptable.
To be acceptable you can not have ANY MEDICAL condition, must have perfect BMI, and perfect blood pressure measurements. 56% of the people who applied were rejected.
Here's the results of the perfectly healthy ideal 85 people:
Age 18-55: 71% OF PARTICIPANTS HAD AN ADVERSE REACTION
Age 56-70: 50% OF PARTICIPANTS HAD AN ADVERSE REACTION
Age 71+: 70% OF PARTICIPANTS HAD AN ADVERSE REACTION
How on earth is the general population (the 56% rejected for not being healthy enough) supposed to get this?
https://www.fda.gov/media/144245/download"
-Kasey McInis Powell
https://lbry.tv/@ceylon:1/100-out-of-100-dead-from-the-vax:1
https://www.fda.gov/media/144413/download
What's your favorite part of the new COVID-19 vaccine?
A.) You can still spread the virus
B.) 2 month immunity
C.) 10-15% reaction rate
D.) Increased HIV risk
E.) Bell's palsy
F.) Anaphylaxis
G.) No manufacturer liability
H.) Still have to wear a mask
I.) All of the above
Links 📝
A.) The Moderna vaccine may not prevent infection or transmission of COVID-19:
https://www.businessinsider.com/moderna-chief-medical-officer-vaccines-interview-2020-11
B.) COVID-19 vaccine will keep you immune for 2 months, NCDHHS says. https://www.cbs17.com/news/north-carolina-news/vaccine-will-keep-you-immune-for-2-months-ncdhhs-says/
C.) 10-15% reaction rate in healthy test subjects. https://www.cnbc.com/2020/12/01/trump-covid-vaccine-czar-says-side-effects-significantly-noticeable-in-10percent-to-15percent-of-recipients.html
D.) Some of the Covid-19 vaccines currently in development could increase the risk of acquiring HIV. https://www.forbes.com/sites/roberthart/2020/10/20/researchers-warn-some-covid-19-vaccines-could-increase-risk-of-hiv-infection/?sh=537f79d53740
E.) FDA staff recommends watching for Bell's palsy in Moderna and Pfizer vaccine recipients. https://www.cnbc.com/2020/12/15/fda-staff-recommends-watching-for-bells-palsy-in-moderna-and-pfizer-vaccine-recipients.html
F.) NHS told not to give Covid vaccine to those with history of allergic reactions. https://www.theguardian.com/world/2020/dec/09/pfizer-covid-vaccine-nhs-extreme-allergy-sufferers-regulators-reaction?fbclid=IwAR2hxGjy9RW85VLdwP5nQIvKEQlUfX1GPNmz3UDqaL_-KpV8a_btBONqZuU
G.) You can’t sue Pfizer or Moderna if you have severe Covid vaccine side effects. The government likely won't compensate you for damages either. https://www.cnbc.com/2020/12/16/covid-vaccine-side-effects-compensation-lawsuit.html
H.) Here’s Why Vaccinated People Still Need to Wear a Mask: https://www.nytimes.com/2020/12/08/health/covid-vaccine-mask.html
As of Friday afternoon, the CDC had already learned of 3,150 people who'd received the vaccine had already been "unable to perform normal daily activities, unable to work, [or] required care from doctor or health care professional".
That figure supposedly represented about 1.5% of the 215,000 vaccine recipients. Not really, through. Vaccinations increased exponentially last week; on Friday alone, 127,000 people were vaccinated.
Unless people had and reported adverse events IMMEDIATELY. The denominator is far lower than 215,000 (the numerator will have a lag too, but the other way). If the lag is one day, almost 4% of the first 88,000 recipients have had a serious adverse event - AFTER THE FIRST SHOT OF THE PFIZER VACCINE.
Remember, the Moderna vaccine is worse, and the second shot is much worse. Also of note - hospitalizations or physicians' care are included here, but not broken out separately. They should be.
@AlexBerenson via Twitter
https://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/acip/meetings/downloads/slides-2020-12/slides-12-19/05-COVID-CLARK.pdf
“Severe allergy-like reactions in at least eight people who received the COVID-19 vaccine produced by Pfizer and BioNTech over the past 2 weeks may be due to a compound in the packaging of the messenger RNA (mRNA) that forms the vaccine’s main ingredient, scientists say. A similar mRNA vaccine developed by Moderna, which was authorized for emergency use in the United States on Friday, also contains the compound, polyethylene glycol (PEG).
PEG has never been used before in an approved vaccine, but it is found in many drugs that have occasionally triggered anaphylaxis—a potentially life-threatening reaction that can cause rashes, a plummeting blood pressure, shortness of breath, and a fast heartbeat. Some allergists and immunologists believe a small number of people previously exposed to PEG may have high levels of antibodies against PEG, putting them at risk of an anaphylactic reaction to the vaccine.”
https://www.sciencemag.org/news/2020/12/suspicions-grow-nanoparticles-pfizer-s-covid-19-vaccine-trigger-rare-allergic-reactions?fbclid=IwAR3olT3XgRhmDmjJjIN_Gc85sjidIGwY_aRL2c6uEuRg6dZETSh3HhSicMg
UK’s Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency:
“Vaccination should only be carried out in facilities where resuscitation measures are available.”
https://www.theguardian.com/world/2020/dec/09/pfizer-covid-vaccine-nhs-extreme-allergy-sufferers-regulators-reaction?fbclid=IwAR0elkSarzGCrFSSlKBlGX6CC83buwvyy8SVJUAOSBPdw4C1MwyQWhLez9A
America:
Let’s have Walmart administer Covid-19 vaccinations across the country 😀
https://www.cnbc.com/quotes/?symbol=WMT
“The health center said as of Friday, three team members are at home and "doing well," while one person is receiving additional treatment.
"Reactions are an expected side effect of vaccination. We are encouraged by our team members who are eager to get the vaccine to help protect themselves and others and bring an end to this pandemic," Advocate Aurora Health said.”
https://www.nbcchicago.com/news/local/suburban-hospital-suspends-covid-19-vaccinations-after-adverse-reactions/2398756/
It’s not mandatory.... except they want proof to have access to move freely.
https://www.nytimes.com/2020/12/13/technology/coronavirus-vaccine-apps.html?smid=fb-share&fbclid=IwAR1ijo3UMGxyT_Ls2Mobj3-VTaLhEROkGOpIskCdoCVzVC_9FvOQ99LGCEE
Start watching at 13 minutes in. A nurse receives the new covid vaccine and as she’s answering questions, she passes out.
📝 Per Pfizer's documents, syncope (fainting) occurs in .02% of people.
📝 If 30% of the population gets this vaccine, that means about 2,000 people will faint like this.
https://www.facebook.com/WRCBtv/videos/166287281903301/
“He said it’s important the public understands Bell’s palsy is just a "bogeyman side effect” and shouldn’t prevent someone from getting the COVID-19 vaccine.”
https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/health/2020/12/15/pfizer-moderna-covid-vaccine-trials-and-bells-palsy-what-it/3904994001/
==> FORCED COVID VACCINES MUST BE PROHIBITED !!
As State Representative, I'm fighting to maintain our God-given individual liberties and parental rights. I support informed consent and empowering each person to choose what is best for themselves and their families.
The State of New York is already floating the idea of forced vaccinations. With COVID vaccines beginning to be administered Monday, I expect it won't be too long before Democrats propose something similar in MN.
One of the bills I'm introducing in Monday's special session would prohibit the governor from further abusing his emergency powers to force vaccinations against an individual's consent.
https://www.fox5ny.com/news/new-york-legislation-would-make-covid-19-vaccination-mandatory
The world's largest vaccine producer, Serum Institute of India, has sued a COVID-19 vaccine trial participant who alleged that the trial caused him “serious side effects”.
https://www.vice.com/en/article/pkdkbg/participant-from-oxfords-covid-19-vaccine-trial-alleges-serious-side-effects?fbclid=IwAR0gxCUesaZ2yUk7TF1HznAQ4431TQt8ndITvdo7D2fHL1Vr3GJ5VXEdgvc
Six people died in Pfizer’s late-stage trial of the COVID-19 vaccine, the US Food and Drug Administration has revealed just hours after Britain became the first country in the world to roll out the vaccine.
But the deaths are said to raise no new safety issues or questions about the vaccine’s effectiveness because all represented events that occurred in the general population at a similar rate, the FDA concluded.
https://thenewdaily.com.au/news/coronavirus/2020/12/09/pfizer-oxford-astrazeneca-vaccines/
Notice the ratio of people with reactions from the list given in the article (per the manufacturer), 2 of them with life threatening allergic reactions, and ask yourself these 3 core questions (you can definitely add more):
- What are the reactions that aren't on the list, but are likely to happen in real world settings? It's never the same as a controlled experiment.
- How many people, especially in the younger adult, adolescent and children populations have severe allergies? (Also how many people would be primed for them after receiving this intervention?)
- What is my personal risk-benefit analysis between the disease and it's preventive pharmaceutical solution? (what do I know about the syndrome, it's lethality in my age group, risk factors, treatments, prevention, my health in general and how it would be affected by going through the disease vs it being impacted by this intervention, etc).
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-9034115/Allergy-risk-Pfizer-jab-TWO-patients-fall-ill-V-Day-rollout.html
We said it was coming. Covid and distance learning has emboldened mandate politics. Oregon just had a new mandate bill file to remove exemptions for all in person learning and events.
https://olis.leg.state.or.us/liz/2019I1/Downloads/CommitteeMeetingDocument/227069?fbclid=IwAR1etK90xiS83Pf0bN3rgS6K6bb0U0v2cF7LeOEV-wTyv-j14iljwm_Izgo
They’re coming for you, Adults. Are you ready to defend freedom now?
Link to bill: https://www.nysenate.gov/legislation/bills/2019/A11179
“One of the things we want to make sure people understand is that they should not be unnecessarily alarmed if there are reports, once we start vaccinating, of someone or multiple people dying within a day or two of their vaccination who are residents of a long-term care facility. That would be something we would expect, as a normal occurrence, because people die frequently in nursing homes."
https://www.gwinnettdailypost.com/features/health/why-vaccinate-our-most-frail-odd-vote-out-shows-the-dilemma/article_25ae0c6e-eb61-54ec-9877-c22ff46a3a48.html
https://www.lifesitenews.com/news/pfizer-coronavirus-vaccine-not-safe-for-pregnant-or-breastfeeding-mums-potential-danger-for-fertility
To paraphrase The Matrix:
"Tell me, Mr. Anderson, what good is a jab, if it's unable to prevent transmission...?" 😶
"In a list of interview highlights released before the special, Holt asked Bourla, “Even though I’ve had the protection, am I still able to transmit it to other people?”
“I think this is something that needs to be examined. We are not certain about that right now with what we know,” Bourla responded."
"""Safe and effective"""
https://thehill.com/news-by-subject/healthcare/528619-pfizer-chairman-were-not-sure-if-someone-can-transmit-virus-after
As the U.S. Food and Drug Administration weighs whether to issue an emergency use authorization for a coronavirus vaccine, Defense Department officials say the inoculations will remain voluntary once the FDA gives the OK.
https://www.military.com/daily-news/2020/11/23/now-us-troops-wont-be-required-get-new-covid-19-vaccine.html?fbclid=IwAR2FLZh1vqsmFvRgNjAH0laXS-SKMlf6CZmU24RvJlgGxt_-F-WEo49H01U
https://www.cnbc.com/2020/12/03/1500-stimulus-checks-for-covid-19-shots-how-one-plan-would-work.html?__source=sharebar|facebook&par=sharebar
This has always been relevant, and now it's more relevant than ever before since the post-WW2 trials, not only in the context of all of us being de-facto research subjects, but also since manufacturers conducting the current expedited trials are attacking research subjects for reporting about the side effects they have experienced, which prevents the rest of us from ever being able to have Informed Consent.
"Medical Ethics and Human Rights
The judges at Nuremberg, although they realized the importance of Hippocratic ethics and the maxim primum non nocere, recognized that more was necessary to protect human research subjects. Accordingly, the judges articulated a sophisticated set of 10 research principles centered not on the physician but on the research subject. These principles, which we know as the Nuremberg Code, included a new, comprehensive, and absolute requirement of informed consent (principle 1), and a new right of the subject to withdraw from participation in an experiment (principle 9). The judges adopted much of the language proposed by Alexander and Ivy but were more emphatic about the necessity and attributes of the subject's consent and explicitly added the subject's right to withdraw.
https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJM199711133372006
https://www.sciencemag.org/news/2020/12/suspicions-grow-nanoparticles-pfizer-s-covid-19-vaccine-trigger-rare-allergic-reactions
I saw this statement and didn’t believe it true until I watched the video below of RFK interviewing her. This statement is at minute 12:10ish.
This is heartbreaking. 🙏🏼
https://youtu.be/KL0iU6owbeE
https://www.bitchute.com/video/nlLNbbVHvyXh/
https://www.nytimes.com/2020/12/16/health/covid-pfizer-vaccine-allergic-reaction.html
https://standforhealthfreedom.com/blog/5-reasons-vaccine-must-be-voluntary/?utm_campaign=Daily%20Newsletter%3A%20Five%20Reasons%20Why%20The%20Coronavirus%20Vaccine%20Must%20Be%20Voluntary%20%28TggqLb%29&utm_medium=email&utm_source=Daily%20Newsletter&_ke=eyJrbF9jb21wYW55X2lkIjogIksydlhBeSIsICJrbF9lbWFpbCI6ICJrYXJpQGthcmlraW5kZW0uY29tIn0%3D
https://www.nexusnewsfeed.com/article/human-rights/unlike-uk-us-fda-allows-pregnant-and-lactating-women-to-receive-experimental-pfizer-covid-vaccine/#.X9bkgu-svws.facebook
https://apple.news/AWlA7oQS7TPGQgwzBG21cbQ
https://thevaccinereaction.org/2020/12/covid-19-vaccine-trial-volunteer-in-india-develops-encephalopathy-and-sues/
https://thevaccinereaction.org/2020/12/over-3000-health-impact-events-after-covid-19-mrna-vaccinations/
https://thevaccinereaction.org/2020/12/peruvian-man-suffers-guillain-barre-like-symptoms-after-receiving-sinopharm-covid-19-vaccine/
https://thevaccinereaction.org/2020/11/coronavirus-vaccine-why-its-important-to-know-whats-in-the-placebo-2/
https://thevaccinereaction.org/2020/11/how-covid-19-vaccine-trials-are-designed/
https://thevaccinereaction.org/2020/11/airline-industry-develops-travel-pass-to-test-require-covid-19-vaccinations-to-fly/
https://thevaccinereaction.org/2020/10/pfizer-wants-to-use-children-in-covid-19-vaccine-clinical-trial/
https://thevaccinereaction.org/2020/12/severe-allergic-reactions-reported-after-pfizer-biontech-covid-19-vaccinations/
https://thevaccinereaction.org/2020/12/pfizer-moderna-covid-19-vaccines-produce-significantly-noticeable-side-effects-in-up-to-15-percent-of-users/
https://thevaccinereaction.org/2020/11/government-proposes-making-it-harder-to-get-vaccine-injury-compensation/
https://thevaccinereaction.org/2020/12/russians-warned-to-abstain-from-drinking-alcohol-after-getting-sputnik-v-covid-19-vaccine/
https://news.ucmerced.edu/news/2020/breast-milk-shows-promise-treating-covid-19-and-protecting-babies
COVID, PATERNALISM & THE DEATH OF PATIENT AUTONOMY
“A year ago, if you had asked me if most doctors respected their patients’ wishes, I would have answered with a resounding yes. If you had asked me if medicine had divorced its paternalistic roots when physicians trampled over ideals like patient autonomy and non-malfeasance, I would have said yes. But that was last year, and in this new world of Covid, panic, hysteria, and ever-present claims of just ‘following the science,’ as if it is the second coming of Jesus, I no longer can say these things. A 2012 review published in the AMA Journal of Ethics argued that modern medical practice methods had shifted from paternalistic to respect for patient autonomy. I have spent six years going through my MD-PhD training, where I have received sermons about how ‘sacred’ the Hippocratic oath is, how patient ‘autonomy’ is paramount. But in today’s day and age, ‘science’ is bandied about like the latest diet fad or catch-all religion, and deniers are the cavemen of yesteryear. ‘Science’ is now used to justify reprehensible and frankly ridiculous, non-evidence-based actions by politicians and physicians alike. Established and validated hierarchies for data quality have been thrown out with the proverbial bathwater, and policies surrounding medical care now violate the very core principles every physician swore to uphold.
I would argue that the two single most intimate moments in life occur when one enters this world and when one leaves it. No other events have the same weight, finality, or are as lasting as birth and death. These two experiences used to be treated with a sense of dignity and respect. There was humanity in them. At least there was before these ‘unprecedented’ times. Now the ‘standard of care’ is the use of restrictive hospital policies that prevent parents from being present for the birth of their children and for caring for them in the hospital. At the other end of the spectrum, you do not even have to dig for evidence. Almost every Covid patient dying in the hospital will die alone. Their final moments will not be shared with the family. Rather, their suffering will be broadcast on an unencrypted zoom call for the world to see. A zoom call hosted from an iPad on a stick held through the door, just waiting for another zoom bomb episode. No holding of hands and coming together for support. Instead, the family is denied their choice and forced to wait for the prehistoric hospital Wi-Fi network to ‘buffer.’ That is the best-case situation. Maybe something comes up, and you do not find out until the hospital finds the time to call.
I will acknowledge that most of these policies probably had no input from actual human beings like physicians or nurses. But every physician and nurse are complicit in them. You have allowed them to exist; you have not protested them; you have not fought them. And will bear the consequences of it, not the soulless administrators who devised them. And that is probably going to be the undoing of a good 100 years of hard work to earn the community’s trust. I know you all are heroes, working your butts off in ungodly conditions. I see the fear on your face, I see how hard you work, I see the good you do. But those families who you ripped apart? They will not see that. Those parents, they will not see that. I am going to be you, and if you did that to me, I would not see the good in you. All they will see is a patriarchal doctor who tore a hole in their lives, prevented the closure, the bonding, the healing they desperately needed. You used your position of power to literally rip parents away from their infants, to prevent working parents from ever seeing their children again. I might add that these policies are not even based on sound scientific reasoning and evidence. There has never been one randomized controlled trial showing that imprisoning dying patients saves lives and improves outcomes. I looked. There is not a single one.
These are moments that are seared into a person’s psyche for life. I understand there are significant risks involved, but these are decisions that the patient has the right to make, not you. We frequently allow patients to refuse lifesaving therapy, refuse to be vaccinated, and take whatever risks they want. We allow adults to make poor choices, and we also allow parents to make poor choices for their children. Why is this choice different? Is it because you are afraid of an inanimate object called SARS-CoV-2? Have you let that fear steal your humanity? Are you trying to be vindictive against a society that you feel has ignored your recommendations? I do not know.
Why now does the medical community get to decide that this one choice is beyond any patient’s capacity to make? Primum non nocere, First do no harm. Solitary confinement is widely considered to be a form of torture. I ask you, healers. Did you do any harm when you forced a patient to die in solitary confinement? Was that your choice to make? Or did you decide for them? I am not you; I cannot answer those questions for you. But I am sitting on the outside, reading the data, and weighing the quality. I am seeing your actions and hearing the stories. And from where I sit, I cannot help but feel I have just seen the death of patient autonomy and the phoenix-like rise of medical paternalism. I hope I am wrong, but the evidence says otherwise.”
—Garrett Jensen, a MD-PhD medical student
https://www.nbcchicago.com/news/local/suburban-hospital-suspends-covid-19-vaccinations-after-adverse-reactions/2398756/
2 out of 144 or 1 in 72...
Extrapolating: When 144,000 people get just the first dose of the coronavirus vaccine, we should expect to see 2,000 adverse outcomes.
Pfizer has announced the vaccine should be administered in places where those vaccinated can be treated for anaphylactic shock.
Does this risk seem acceptable to you?
“Vaccine Adverse Reaction Update
“The Bartlett Regional Hospital staff member and first known adverse allergic reaction to the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 vaccine in the U.S. is recovering and will remain another night in the hospital under observation. She is still encouraging her colleagues to get the vaccine.
“As per the CDC’s recommended method of vaccine administration, recipients are required to remain in place for 15 minutes after inoculation in the event any after effects arise. After 10 minutes, the Bartlett health care worker showed signs of an anaphylactic reaction, with increased heartbeat, shortness of breath and skin rash and redness. She was given epinephrine and Benadryl, admitted to the hospital, and put on an intravenous epinephrine drip.
“Her reaction was serious but not life threatening, said Emergency Department Medical Director Lindy Jones, MD. She had no known previous allergies or adverse reactions to vaccines.
“A second staff member experienced eye puffiness, light headedness, and scratchy throat ten minutes after being injected with the vaccine today. His reaction was not considered anaphylaxis. He was taken to the Emergency Department and administered epinephrine, Pepcid and Benadryl. He felt completely back to normal within an hour and was released. He too does not want his experience to have a negative impact on his colleagues lining up for the vaccine.
“Both incidents were reported to the CDC’s Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS) database. Bartlett Regional Hospital and The State of Alaska Department of Health and Social Services (DHSS) are in close communication with the CDC, and the agency is providing guidance and support.
“We were expecting these things and we had all the right systems in place,” said Infection Preventionist Charlee Gribbon.
“Gribbon is overseeing a mass operation to vaccinate as many staff as possible. Four hundred Bartlett staff signed up for the COVID-19 inoculation. Over the past 24 hours, 144 doses of the vaccine have been administered in Phase 1. Staff will receive their second booster dose in three weeks.
“Our goal is to be transparent with Alaskans and the public,” Alaska’s Chief Medical Officer Anne Zink said today. “We have no plans to change our vaccine schedule, dosing or regimen.”
“According to the latest story on this incident in the New York Times, “F.D.A. officials have said they would require Pfizer to increase its monitoring for anaphylaxis and submit data on it once the vaccine comes into use. Pfizer also said that the vaccine is recommended to be administered in settings that have access to equipment to manage anaphylaxis.”
Katie Bausler
Community Relations Director
Bartlett Regional Hospital
Office: 907-796-8567
Cell: 907-321-2755
[email protected]
BRH Newsroom
COVID-19 FAQs
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0946672X19305784
https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/17/22/8674/htm
https://www.jennifermargulis.net/books/the-vaccine-friendly-plan/
https://www.paulthomasmd.com/freedomtochoose.html
https://www.npr.org/sections/coronavirus-live-updates/2020/12/02/941022673/u-k-approves-pfizer-coronavirus-vaccine-for-emergency-use?utm_term=nprnews&utm_source=facebook.com&utm_campaign=npr&utm_medium=social
https://www.cbsnews.com/news/eeoc-covid-19-vaccine-employers-exclude-unvaccinated-workers/
https://journalofethics.ama-assn.org/article/mandatory-vaccination-legal-time-epidemic/2006-04
https://www.theatlantic.com/health/archive/2020/12/what-expect-when-you-get-covid-19-vaccine/617428/?utm_campaign=the-atlantic&utm_medium=social&utm_source=facebook
https://www.army.mil/article/241845/rollout_of_covid_19_vaccine_distribution_is_off_to_successful_start_officials_say
https://www.dakotanewsnow.com/2020/12/19/can-employers-require-the-covid-19-vaccine/
As of 5:30 pm on Dec. 18, 215,362 people in the US had been given a COVID vaccine.
5,052 of them had a "severe" reaction. (Unable to work/function, required care from a hospital.)
That is a severe reaction rate of 2.3%.
We are only seeing the very, very tip of the iceberg here. These are only the immediate reactions, it's too soon for long term. And theoretically they're vaccinating healthy people first.
What happens when they vaccinate the elderly or the not-so-healthy? What happens weeks or months down the road?
If you get this vaccine, YOU ARE THE EXPERIMENT. Remember that.
If you're time poor and can't watch this in it's entirety, start at approx 30 mins...
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=cTtIPBPSv0U
Found the manufacturer insert for the Pfizer c-19 jab if any is interested:
http://labeling.pfizer.com/ShowLabeling.aspx?id=14471
https://www.bbc.com/news/health-55244122
https://trib.al/vKWhOnE
https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2020/12/03/opinion/covid-19-vaccine-timeline.html
This is also some good info to go though when you have the time-
https://www.fda.gov/media/144245/download?fbclid=IwAR1uf-Q93JBd_s_0fL4-E2853vewRGSCYVspKpI7lKyMJ_MMqB-G_jWfKZM
Jay Walker, CEO of Apiject, is coming out with some truth about the #RFID chips placed inside the vaccine itself.
He said is only like a manufacturing serial number, and it's optional, but I said that's a load of BS because is still has the potential to track you and #WHO knows what else.
Also BE AWARE of the #RNA technology in the Covid Vaccines, as #GatesOfHell himself admitted: https://youtu.be/Eb2zRCCVhyY
Watch and decide for yourselves.
"Moderna volunteer sounds alarm on twitter about severe side effects and low "effectiveness" standards. He seems far more knowledgeable than most study subjects I would guess, worth hearing his experience (he is very in favor of this vaccine and worries it will be derailed because people won't be warned about how sick it would make them):
"Adverse reactions are common after the second shot of both these #RNA vaccines. I personally experienced an adverse reaction at least 50x worse with the Moderna vaccine than any other vaccine I have received, and I have received almost every vaccine."
"The population to be initially vaccinated will be front-line workers, and those most at risk of severe COVID symptoms or death (those with diabetes, heart conditions, the elderly, etc.). I am very concerned about severe adverse reactions in the latter group."
"It's up to vaccine companies as far as what they define to be a Grade 3 vs. Grade 4 adverse reaction. The grades are defined by the FDA; however, the questionnaires asked of participants have to be properly written, and staff trained, to align responses with FDA intent."
"There are other confounding factors in grade level assessment. My adverse reaction was so bad that I sat by my phone all night ready to dial 911 if I felt I would lose consciousness. I didn't call, because it would cost hundreds of dollars out of pocket for the ambulance and therefore, I couldn't positively answer the question the next morning, "Did you seek medical attention for any medical symptoms in the last 24 hours" (which is a contributing criterion for Grade 4). This is an example of how a badly-written question leads to bad data."
"Even if (conservatively speaking) the adverse reaction incidence rate is "only" say 10% (in keeping with the below Science editorial), then for the expected 40 million people to be vaccinated by the end of January, that's 4 million adverse reactions."
"Four million adverse reactions *will* be a media fiasco. People will tell their stories. Anti-vaxxers will be ecstatic. This is why I decided to speak up as a whistleblower in the CNBC story. RNA vaccines, though extremely easy to develop, may present significant challenges."
"It is extremely important to give people time to adjust to the idea that upon receiving the second shot, there's a significant possibility that they're going to have one of the worst nights of their life -- but that it might be worth it, because COVID can be much worse."
"As a data scientist, I can tell you that in the case of the Moderna vaccine, the followup questions that are asked of participants by a tracking app, for at least 8 days after each shot, are extremely badly written. Consequently, their data is bad (mostly incomplete)."
"comparing the Moderna and Pfizer adverse reaction prevalence to that of Shingrex is hardly a high bar, given that Shingrex is notorious for triggering adverse reactions that can last 2 years or more."
"My guess: most SARS-CoV-2 vaccines will last 3-6 months, depending on the type of vaccine, before a booster is needed. But we don't know how bad the interferon response will be for the 3rd or 4th or shot. If the Moderna trial required a 3rd shot, I would have dropped out!"
"The primary caveats are not being clearly explained by #Pfizer / #Moderna or the media. These vaccines were ~95% effective *for a small sample*, and, more importantly, only *at 2-4 months post-vaccination* And then there is this comment from another user."
"All they want to show is it's 95%, nothing else. Just like last Monday, just show the 90%, but didn't tell the whole story that it was 90% at 7 days after the second dose. Big Pharma and their money buying power!" "
So, what is RNA, first of all?
RNA serves as messenger system. It is a molecule that allows our genome, contained in all the DNA inside our nucleus, to be converted into functional components.
If the DNA is the encyclopedia for a living organism, RNA is a page of notes jotted down from one volume of the giant DNA encyclopedia. It’s not the same as the original, but instead is a similar but simplified and more user-friendly format.
Those RNA notes are then read by a specialized complex called a ribosome and a protein is synthesized as a result. The end product, the protein, is the functional component of a gene.
RNA itself only exists for a brief period of time, only as long as it is needed to be used as the template for the protein. Then it disintegrates.
In the case of the COVID-19 vaccines, there isn’t any DNA involved. We already know which RNA notes are the template for the viral proteins, so that step is completely bypassed.
The RNA in the vaccine will never interact with our DNA, and certainly won’t change our DNA. They aren’t the same molecules so they can’t interact with each other! In fact, RNA stays in a completely different compartment of our cells than DNA does.
So, the RNA in the vaccine will get into our bodies encased in a little fatty coating (because RNA is not stable and doesn’t exist for long), our cells will read the template and make the viral protein, which our immune system will recognize and mount a memory immune response to. That’s it! No DNA involved at all.
Animation showing how the mRNA vaccine against Covid-19 works.
The new vaccine, BNT162b2, has been developed by Pfizer/BioNTech. It uses a strand of messenger RNA genetic material (blue) based on that in the SARS-CoV-2 virus that causes Covid-19.
This is injected into the body encased in lipid nanoparticles, which allow it to be taken up by the body's cells. The mRNA is read by the cells, causing them to produce a mutated version of the viral spike protein (pink).
The mutation has been designed to stimulate an immune response, causing the body to produce antibodies (purple) against the spike protein. This means that the body is primed to attack the virus should it be encountered after vaccination, preventing disease.
The vaccine was approved in the UK on 2nd December 2020.
Take a look at our other coronavirus imagery: https://bit.ly/2wZa2Mb
Just a heads up - I have been sent Covid #Vaccine concerns - of note - all I have been sent are AstraZeneca vaccine - the two new coming out are Pfizer and Moderna - check for the same ingredients of concern in these vaccines and decide for yourself - thanks to you all 😎
#RNA #ChAD0x1 researchsquare.com
#recombinantDNA and #MRC-5 (aborted 14wk old male Caucasian fetus lung material that is replicated over and over)
#INPIC: The Central Drugs Standard Control Organisation on Wednesday permitted Pune-based #Gennova Biopharmaceuticals to conduct Phase 1/2 #clinicaltrials, along with animal toxicity data, for its mRNA Covid-19 vaccine candidate.
It is India's first messenger #RNA (mRNA) Covid vaccine candidate. Globally, US-based #pharmagiant Pfizer Inc has developed its mRNA vaccine.
Read more 👉👉 https://bit.ly/340Me85
https://www.news-medical.net/news/20201011/Rapid-and-sensitive-detection-of-SARS-CoV-2-with-functionalized-magnetic-nanoparticles.aspx
https://twitter.com/BusyDrT/status/1335020831504785417?s=20
https://www.sciencenews.org/article/coronavirus-covid-19-why-vaccines-cold-freeze-pfizer-moderna
https://www.latimes.com/science/story/2020-12-15/how-the-covid-19-vaccines-from-moderna-and-pfizer-compare-head-to-head
Looking for safety data on #Covid19vaccines?
This is from #Moderna.
Out of 193 potential participants, only 85 were deemed acceptable.
To be accepted you cannot have ANY medical conditions, must have perfect BMI, perfect blood pressure measurements, you cannot be on any type of medication even over-the-counter, and you MUST agree to "adhere to Lifestyle Conditions throughout study duration." Over 50% of the people who applied, were rejected.
https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/record/NCT04283461
•45 participants were between the ages of 18 and 55.
•20 participants were between the ages of 56 and 70.
•20 participants were of the age of 71 or older.
Here are the results of the perfectly healthy 85 people they chose:
Ages 18-55: 71% OF PARTICIPANTS HAD AN ADVERSE REACTION
Ages 56-70: 50% OF PARTICIPANTS HAD AN ADVERSE REACTION
Ages 71+: 70% OF PARTICIPANTS HAD AN ADVERSE REACTION
https://www.icandecide.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/11/Moderna-Combined-Production.pdf
And who knows what types of long-term issues this may cause these people, too.
https://oye.news/news/health/vaccines/the-truth-about-the-moderna-pfizer-covid-19-vaccine-effectiveness-claims/
"Moderna volunteer sounds alarm on twitter about severe side effects and low "effectiveness" standards. He seems far more knowledgeable than most study subjects I would guess, worth hearing his experience (he is very in favor of this vaccine and worries it will be derailed because people won't be warned about how sick it would make them):
"Adverse reactions are common after the second shot of both these #RNA vaccines. I personally experienced an adverse reaction at least 50x worse with the Moderna vaccine than any other vaccine I have received, and I have received almost every vaccine."
"The population to be initially vaccinated will be front-line workers, and those most at risk of severe COVID symptoms or death (those with diabetes, heart conditions, the elderly, etc.). I am very concerned about severe adverse reactions in the latter group."
"It's up to vaccine companies as far as what they define to be a Grade 3 vs. Grade 4 adverse reaction. The grades are defined by the FDA; however, the questionnaires asked of participants have to be properly written, and staff trained, to align responses with FDA intent."
"There are other confounding factors in grade level assessment. My adverse reaction was so bad that I sat by my phone all night ready to dial 911 if I felt I would lose consciousness. I didn't call, because it would cost hundreds of dollars out of pocket for the ambulance and therefore, I couldn't positively answer the question the next morning, "Did you seek medical attention for any medical symptoms in the last 24 hours" (which is a contributing criterion for Grade 4). This is an example of how a badly-written question leads to bad data."
"Even if (conservatively speaking) the adverse reaction incidence rate is "only" say 10% (in keeping with the below Science editorial), then for the expected 40 million people to be vaccinated by the end of January, that's 4 million adverse reactions."
"Four million adverse reactions *will* be a media fiasco. People will tell their stories. Anti-vaxxers will be ecstatic. This is why I decided to speak up as a whistleblower in the CNBC story. RNA vaccines, though extremely easy to develop, may present significant challenges."
"It is extremely important to give people time to adjust to the idea that upon receiving the second shot, there's a significant possibility that they're going to have one of the worst nights of their life -- but that it might be worth it, because COVID can be much worse."
"As a data scientist, I can tell you that in the case of the Moderna vaccine, the followup questions that are asked of participants by a tracking app, for at least 8 days after each shot, are extremely badly written. Consequently, their data is bad (mostly incomplete)."
"comparing the Moderna and Pfizer adverse reaction prevalence to that of Shingrex is hardly a high bar, given that Shingrex is notorious for triggering adverse reactions that can last 2 years or more."
"My guess: most SARS-CoV-2 vaccines will last 3-6 months, depending on the type of vaccine, before a booster is needed. But we don't know how bad the interferon response will be for the 3rd or 4th or shot. If the Moderna trial required a 3rd shot, I would have dropped out!"
"The primary caveats are not being clearly explained by #Pfizer / #Moderna or the media. These vaccines were ~95% effective *for a small sample*, and, more importantly, only *at 2-4 months post-vaccination* And then there is this comment from another user."
"All they want to show is it's 95%, nothing else. Just like last Monday, just show the 90%, but didn't tell the whole story that it was 90% at 7 days after the second dose. Big Pharma and their money buying power!" "
https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMoa2034577
https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S1471491420302124
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/health-54902908?at_custom2=facebook_page&at_custom1=%5Bpost+type%5D&at_medium=custom7&at_custom4=C7755A78-2803-11EB-A053-63113A982C1E&at_campaign=64&at_custom3=BBC+News
https://bit.ly/3liiY3s
https://beta.regulations.gov/comment/CDC-2020-0081-0001
https://www.biznews.com/thought-leaders/2020/12/19/covid-19-vaccines-wsj?fbclid=IwAR3TIgbieToKPfx0oefEmhUtdc4jHQ-vzuCv_kzndvu84obcYb78d7IQ7Y8
https://www.fox32chicago.com/news/alaska-health-care-worker-suffers-adverse-reaction-after-covid-19-vaccine?utm_campaign=trueanthem&utm_medium=trueanthem&utm_source=facebook&fbclid=IwAR2uozf5qUqLx0nTkn-fnrw8qiVmGbxMXDKd5CDMzbPjGKZwAks-oW4dgDY
2nd Health Care Worker
https://www.pix11.com/news/national/coronavirus/second-alaska-health-care-worker-has-severe-reaction-to-covid-19-vaccine?fbclid=IwAR3RCDTVMXQ56YUtRLGEM5tKf7GBrSO-4K_xESjeWEMj6trp_g0u8TsB7ek
https://www.nbcnews.com/news/education/covid-having-devastating-impact-children-vaccine-won-t-fix-everything-n1251172?cid=sm_npd_nn_fb_nn&fbclid=IwAR12rc1hCZbRHpdDc7I6BLpXlmKCgOX95K8b-JbG0ygRwIF8QL01Gkcs22g
https://uk.reuters.com/article/uk-factcheck-covid-19-vaccine-modify/false-claim-a-covid-19-vaccine-will-genetically-modify-humans-idUSKBN22U2BZ
https://www.history.com/news/swine-flu-rush-vaccine-election-year-1976
The Moderna COVID-19 Vaccine contains the following ingredients: messenger ribonucleic acid (mRNA), lipids (SM-102, polyethylene glycol [PEG] 2000 dimyristoyl glycerol [DMG], cholesterol, and 1,2-distearoyl-sn-glycero-3-phosphocholine [DSPC]), tromethamine, tromethamine hydrochloride, acetic acid, sodium acetate, and sucrose
https://30g7el1b4b1n28kgpr414nuu-wpengine.netdna-ssl.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/12/Pfizer-BioNTech-COVID-19-Vaccine-EUA-Fact-Sheet-for-HCP_0.pdf
https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04283461
https://www.health.nd.gov/sites/www/files/documents/COVID%20Vaccine%20Page/COVID-19%20Vaccine%20Fetal%20Cell%20Handout.pdf
https://www.sciencemag.org/news/2020/06/abortion-opponents-protest-covid-19-vaccines-use-fetal-cells
🙄https://kfoxtv.com/news/nation-world/vatican-ok-to-get-virus-vaccines-using-abortion-cell-lines
https://lozierinstitute.org/what-you-need-to-know-about-the-covid-19-vaccine/
https://www.cvdvaccine-us.com/images/pdf/fact-sheet-for-hcp-administering-vaccine-vaccination-providers-full-eua-prescribing-information.pdf?fbclid=IwAR2iAU0EVHT1OQwY8E_an-5LKZLy4r07JWfacfTki3JQA0dgtzXQ7ErW0wA
https://www.immunize.org/fda/
https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.technologyreview.com/2020/12/09/1013538/what-are-the-ingredients-of-pfizers-covid-19-vaccine/amp/
https://www.health.nd.gov/sites/www/files/documents/COVID%20Vaccine%20Page/COVID-19%20Vaccine%20Fetal%20Cell%20Handout.pdf
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6027112/
https://vaccine.guide/
https://www.livingwhole.org/god-does-not-support-vaccines/
Learntherisk.org
https://knowbetterdobetter.blog/
Aborted fetal cells
Here is a list....
☀RA273
Taken from the lung of a 3 month gestation aborted baby. R=Rubella, A=Abortus, 27=27th baby, 3=3rd tissue explant. (Then cultivated on the WI-38 aborted fetal cell line to get the MMR viruses. Stanley Plotkin, vaccine developer, would later reveal that 40 more babies were aborted after RA273 was successfully isolated, with virus strains taken from 34 of them. A total of over 80 separate abortions were involved in the research and final production of the present day rubella vaccine- 21 abortions from the original WI-1 through WI-26 fetal cell lines that failed, plus WI-38 itself, plus 67 from the attempts to isolate the rubella virus.)
☀MERC-5: Developed in 1970 from the lung tissue of a 14 week gestation male baby. Introduced in Great Britain by the Medical Research Council.
☀HEK-293: Developed in 1973 from aborted baby kidney cells genetically engineered combined with adenovirus. 293 is the number of the experiment.
☀Per C6
Developed in 2001 from an isolated retina of a baby about 18 weeks gestation. This cell line was made to be ‘immortal’ but failed. It caused cancerous tumors in mice. Was used in the HIV vaccine trial but caused cancer so it was pulled. Crucell-advent of their PER C6 fetal cell line took off. PER C6 is a normal cell that has been modified to resist cell senescence. In doing so, it introduces the potential for cancer to form in the vaccine recipient.
☀WI-26 VA4
An SV40 transformed derivative of WI-26, a human diploid cell line derived from embryonic lung tissue of a male Caucasian. The cells have SV40 T-Ag but infectious virus has not been rescued.
☀WALVAX2
Recently developed from the lung tissue of a 3 month gestation baby girl. To replace the current MERC-5 and WI-38 which are depleting.
To obtain all these, the scientists had to be present at the time of the abortion because "In order to sustain 96% of the cells, the live tissue would need to be preserved within 5 minutes of the abortion"-Dr. C. Ward Kischer.
And it's still happening today. Notice again the last listed: WALVAX2. This is a brand new line in which 9 babies died in the making and the baby ultimately used was intentionally delivered alive in the sac for best harvesting. This is going to be the New MMR.
http://www.lifenews.com/2015/09/09/scientists-in-china-create-new-vaccines-using-body-parts-from-nine-aborted-babies/
And it will admittedly continue. PBS recently reports on how fetal tissue is VITAL to vaccine and drug development:
http://www.pbs.org/newshour/rundown/medical-researchers-say-fetal-tissue-remains-essential/
There are 271 vaccines (and 85 drugs) in the pipeline awaiting approvals that we cannot see the ingredients too yet but you can bet they include fetal lines just like our current ones do:
http://phrma.org/medicines-in-development-for-vaccines-2013
http://soundchoice.org/aborted-fetal-products/
WALVAX 2 is taken from the lung tissue of a 3 month gestation female who was ultimately selected from among 9 aborted BABIES. The scientists noted how they followed specific guidelines to mimic WI-38 and MRC-5 in selecting the aborted babies, ranging from 2-4 months gestation. They further noted how they induced labor using a “water bag” abortion to shorten the delivery time and PREVENT THE DEATH OF THE FETUS to ensure LIVE intact organs which were immediately sent to the labs for cell preparation.
Keep telling yourself that this is ok..."for the greater good". This can be done without murdering babies. It's done all the time without murdering babies....Just not when the cdc can profit from it in the U.S. This practice is disgusting. Did you know that fragmented fetal DNA has been proven to combine with vaccine recipient DNA permanently altering that child's DNA? Did you know that the study to prove this and show the link between this fractional DNA and childhood Leukemia is currently underway? Its actually proven, but in order to get a peer reviewed study to the public is not so easy. Very rich people will lose a lot of money. That's what happens when you let the cdc OWN vaccine patents, make profits from vaccines, and then also police themselves.
And please heavily consider the part that explains that these new vaccine cell lines are being made in China...they currently ship us fish farmed in feces, toys with high lead content, and plastic rice...Do you really think they are concerned about your family's safety?
Not only that but did you know....
They found intact human male DNA-- not even in fragments. The whole genome was found in the MMR-V. This was confirmed to be the DNA of the aborted male child called "MRC-5" that is listed as a vaccine ingredient.
Click: https://www.corvelva.it/en/speciale-corvelva/vaccinegate-en/what-did-we-find-in-the-mmrv-priorix-tetra-vaccine.html
https://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/pubs/pinkbook/downloads/appendices/b/excipient-table-2.pdf
Praying for you! This is a note I wrote 6 months into my vaccine research journey..
• Vaccines and soul ties
Have you seen a child having a seizure after a vaccine?
Example here:
https://www.facebook.com/sas.bullock1/posts/1232407800119330
Demonic possession was my first thought when I saw the footage but thought I was being totally crazy and going off the edge.
But as I read more and more about vaccines, the more plausible it seems that there could be a spiritual component.
1. Memories in DNA could be passed down generations. (This is "scientific"....and the passing reminds me of generations curses / blessings.)
2. When a couple has physical relations, DNA is passed and retained. (Also "scientific".)
3. In Christian circles, physical intimacy is said to result in "soul ties".
4. Could DNA = "soul ties", "spiritual issues"??
5. Listen to how human DNA is extracted for the development and making of vaccines: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dlqFQLLOTEU&feature=youtu.be
"What if we could remove aborted baby cells from vaccinations? Would that then make it safe to inject human beings with animal cells from pig blood, rabbit brains, dog kidneys, cow hearts or toxins such as aluminum, mercury and formaldehyde...etc into ourselves or others?
Is there a reason why God mentioned the importance of keeping our blood pure so many times in the Bible?
Could injecting human beings with DNA from other humans and animals actually be opening up doors for physical, mental, emotional and spiritual torment?"
http://www.whollyalignment.com/vaccines.html"
https://www.newsmax.com/t/newsmax/article/1002579?section=newsfront&keywords=virus-outbreak-vatican-vaccine&year=2020&month=12&date=21&id=1002579&oref=m.facebook.com
Children of God for life has a lot of information on all vaccines that use aborted fetal cell lines. https://cogforlife.org/wp-content/uploads/CovidCompareMoralImmoral.pdf?fbclid=IwAR0DcsHblQ5OGWBAuKI5qtv_yE2lreNSaG-Y5QXuQYq3_xEiKS3vPL8ssG0
Some are wondering if the new mRNA COVID v@ ccines by Pfizer & Moderna, like other v@ ccines, contain aborted human fetal cells. I do not conclusively know the answer, as the complete list of ingredients has not yet been released to my knowledge, but according to Dr. Daniel Hinthorn, who was interviewed by Focus on the Family (12/18) and testified about the approved COVID v@ ccines by Pfizer & Moderna, “…they are not created from fetal cell lines; however, often these kinds of v@ ccines are checked in fetal cell lines just to see if they work…” If it’s true that aborted fetal cells were used for that part, then I don’t understand how checking the efficacy of these v@ ccines is not considered part of the process of providing vaccines for the public. The process, from the very beginning to the injecting of the v@ ccine into the skin of the recipient, includes safety testing; so if aborted fetal cell lines were used for safety testing, then aborted babies were indeed involved in the COVID v@ ccine, even IF cells are not among the ingredients.
This leads to another question: should it matter? I’m not going to give an answer (it’s not for me to decide for you) but hopefully this will help you think through some things you may have not yet considered. When I first learned that v@ ccines are made with aborted human DNA, I dismissed it until I gave it more thought and discovered I had several misconceptions. Perhaps you are a pro-lifer who gets v@ ccines - can you relate with believing any of the rationalizations below? Would you be willing to at least read those?
“BUT THE V@ CCINE INDUSTRY DIDN’T COERCE OR PERFORM THE ABORTIONS, SO THEY’RE TAKING SOMETHING BAD AND TURNING IT INTO SOMETHING GOOD, EVEN NOBLE, RIGHT?”
I am under the conviction that the use of DNA from aborted human babies serves to condone, justify, and incentivize abortions. We’re not talking about good coming from accidental deaths that couldn’t be prevented; these aborted deaths are voluntary. We’re talking about scientists who need deaths of healthy babies, ones of a particular gestational age, who are delivered in special ways, whose parts are dissected and preserved in distinct ways. The one who performs the abortion, as well as the other staff, has a conflict of interest interfering with their influence over the mother’s decision to abort. On top of the profit from the procedure itself, they are paid to use specific techniques to kill and remove the child in a manner that will not damage the organs and tissues needed for the v@ ccine study and preserve it accordingly. For the WALVAX-2 “ingredient” (a.k.a. aborted human DNA), “they induced labor using a ‘water bag’ abortion to shorten the delivery time and prevent the death of the fetus to ensure live intact organs which were immediately sent to the labs for cell preparation.” (Source: Go to the LifeNews website and search: Scientists in China Create New Va@ ccines Using Body Parts From Nine Aborted Babies, 9/9/15) Additionally, according to Dr. C. Ward Kischer, the scientist must also be present during the abortion because, "in order to sustain 96% of the cells, the live tissue would need to be preserved within 5 minutes of the abortion."
THE ARGUMENT: “BUT IT’S JUST A FEW.”
No. Dr. Stanley Plotkin, v@ ccine developer and “pioneer,” testified in this deposition that in just ONE report he used 76 aborted fetuses (summed up at 2 minutes, 32 seconds) (search YouTube for “Stanley Plotkin - abortion’s for v@ ccines - 2018 deposition” on 11/12/18 (but correctly spell v@ ccines).
On v@ ccine ingredients lists, each letter-number code represents which number baby DNA was chosen after studying all of the options. For instance, v@ ccine ingredient RA273 represents: Rubella (R), Abortus (A), the 27th baby: the lung of a 3 month gestation aborted baby (27), 3rd tissue explants (3). WALVAX-2 was the 2nd of 9 babies aborted for that study. Cells, cellular debris, protein, and DNA from aborted babies are identified as RA273, WALVAX2, PER C6, HEK293, IMR-90, IMR-91, WI 1-26, WI-38, WI-44, MCR-5, HEK-293, and Lambda.hE1, are found in more than 23 different v@ ccines.
“IT’S A FORM OF ORGAN-DONATION AND THAT IS AN INDISPUTABLY GOOD THING. HOW IS THIS ANY DIFFERENT?”
It is not comparable to organ-donation because it is not a voluntary choice on the part of the donor (i.e. baby). In organ-donation: 1) the death of the organ-donor is unable to be prevented, and 2) the donation is a voluntary choice on the part of the donor. Neither is true when it comes to the abortion of healthy babies selected for v@ ccine studies/production. The moral dilemma: is it ethical and does it honor God to take a stand against abortion while simultaneously a) supporting an industry that profits from it and b) willingly using the products (i.e. v@ ccines) made from it?
“BUT LIKE ORGAN-DONATION AND BLOOD INFUSIONS, DNA FROM ABORTED HUMAN BABIES SAVES LIVES, RIGHT?”
V@ ccine package inserts state that they have notbeen tested for carcinogenic, mutagenic, or fertility impairing properties. Pause. That can take a minute to sink in. Not tested for carcinogenic, mutagenic, or fertility impairing properties. The MRC-5 human diploid cell line, for example, is from human DNA aborted in the 1960s. It is an “immortalized” cell line (a.k.a. continuous or abnormal cell) with insertions, deletions, and translocations (i.e. rewritten DNA) and is considered oncogenic (i.e. cancer), containing insertional mutagenesis following DNA integration. Unlike human conception, which is a combination of genes from 2 sources to make a new whole, insertional mutagenesis is a corruption from foreign material. (*I can share a link.)
[*Human fetal DNA integration leads to mutagenesis and is carcinogenic. Another common v@ ccine ingredient, formaldehyde, is also a carcinogen and mutagen. The herbicide, glyphosate (a.k.a. Round Up, by Monsanto), is also a carcinogen that is found to have contaminated multiple v@ ccine ingredients (I can share the pdf). Many v@ ccine side effects include symptoms that are identical to heavy metal poisoning. Trace amounts of heavy metals contained in v@ ccines add up to be significant amounts when administered in multiple v@ ccines given on the same day, or in the same 6 month time period, or 12 month time period, and it overwhelms the body and the immune system. (Our pediatrician highly recommends the documentary, Trace Amounts.) The heavy metals cross the blood-brain barrier and enter the brain and tissues more easily when giving Tylenol, which is commonly recommended for the low grade fever and soreness of the injection site. Allergies have become prevalent in our society and v@ ccine ingredients include allergens like egg proteins, gelatin, baker’s yeast, and latex. V@ ccines contain antigens (virus/disease) grown on human and animal DNA, and adjuvants (added ingredients), and they combine to form a dangerous cocktail (or dare I say potion?). The end of Revelation 18:23 says, “…and all nations were deceived by your sorcery.” (“Sorcery” from the Greek word ‘pharmakeia’ means: the use or administering of drugs; poisoning; or sorcery/magical arts.) And John wrote Revelation to warn us of what we are to expect before the return of Jesus Christ. This will happen – if not now, then in the future, and it is wise to be on guard against it.]
“WHAT’S DONE IS DONE. WE CAN ONLY MOVE FORWARD BECAUSE WE’RE NOT SAFE WITHOUT V@ CCINES, RIGHT?”
Studies on carcinogenic, mutagenic, and fertility-impairing properties are not the only studies that are lacking. Safety studies on pregnant recipients are lacking. Studies on long-term safety are lacking. Safety studies on combinations of v@ ccines (multiple injections) administered in a single appointment are lacking. Safety studies on the compounding effects of all of the v@ ccines in the CDC schedule administered at the recommended ages are lacking. Scientific studies with double-blind, inert placebos are lacking. Third-party experimentation with no conflict of interest is lacking. What’s worse is that accountability for v@ ccine safety is lacking: The 1986 National Childhood V@ ccine Injury Act (NCVIA) prevented the v@ ccine industry from being sued directly by the public for v@ ccine injury. So the National V@ ccine Injury Compensation Program (VICP) was set up as a federal "no-fault" system which, since 1988, has paid out over 4 billion dollars in v@ ccine injury compensation. This “no-fault” system had one condition, established by the Mandate for Safer Childhood V@ ccine clause in December 1987: it legally required the Department of Health and Human Services to submit to Congress biennial reports which are to include detailed Improvements in v@ ccine safety. No such reports have ever been submitted – not once in 30+ years (I can share the link.)
PROS OUTWEIGH THE CONS? SACRIFICE “FEW” FOR THE MASSES?
It is my conviction that sacrificing a human life via abortion IS able to be justified (forgiven) by the blood of Jesus but is unable to be justified (made honorable) by good motives, even if it’s in attempt to promote health for the masses. (I say “attempt” because the evidence convinces me v@ ccines do not promote health but actually damage the immune system of the masses, even if the symptoms don’t appear until later and appear in the form of allergies, autoimmune disease, infertility, cancer, Alzheimer’s, etc.)
I WAS PRO-V@ CCINES. I have lots of doctors, nurses, and other medical professionals in my family and was raised with a western medicine approach to health. I was the last person to want to consider that my doctor, a firm believer in Jesus, might not know the ins and outs about v@ ccines. I have two immuno-compromised children and was the last person on earth who wanted to consider that the immunologist’s advice might not be right. I have no medical training and am the last person who wanted the weighty responsibility of managing the health of my children. It took me OVER A DECADE to sift through enough PubMed abstracts, other scientific studies, CDC adverse reaction and contraindication info, v@ ccine manufacturer ingredients lists, VAERS v@ ccine reactions database, and hear testimonies from enough medical professionals who turned from being advocates for v@ ccines to advocates for v@ ccine safety, etc. before my perspective did a full 180. But don’t take my word for it. My intention is not to enter into any kind of debate – I know that no matter a person’s stance on v@ ccines, we all share the sincere goal of promoting the best possible health for our loved ones. I do hope, though, that all will investigate the matter and seek to be informed before consenting. The news articles and videos on the Physicians for Informed Consent website is a good place to start. Beware of censored search engines (I can share with you websites or uncensored search engine options). May God bless us and lead us in these difficult decisions. I pray for peace, health, and safety for all.
https://cogforlife.org/2020/03/25/much-hyped-moderna-mrna-1273-covid-19-vaccine-uses-aborted-fetal-cells-sanofi-pasteurs-version-does-not/
https://lozierinstitute.org/what-you-need-to-know-about-the-covid-19-vaccine/
https://lozierinstitute.org/update-covid-19-vaccine-candidates-and-abortion-derived-cell-lines/
Aborted fetal cells
Here is a list....
☀RA273
Taken from the lung of a 3 month gestation aborted baby. R=Rubella, A=Abortus, 27=27th baby, 3=3rd tissue explant. (Then cultivated on the WI-38 aborted fetal cell line to get the MMR viruses. Stanley Plotkin, vaccine developer, would later reveal that 40 more babies were aborted after RA273 was successfully isolated, with virus strains taken from 34 of them. A total of over 80 separate abortions were involved in the research and final production of the present day rubella vaccine- 21 abortions from the original WI-1 through WI-26 fetal cell lines that failed, plus WI-38 itself, plus 67 from the attempts to isolate the rubella virus.)
☀MERC-5: Developed in 1970 from the lung tissue of a 14 week gestation male baby. Introduced in Great Britain by the Medical Research Council.
☀HEK-293: Developed in 1973 from aborted baby kidney cells genetically engineered combined with adenovirus. 293 is the number of the experiment.
☀Per C6
Developed in 2001 from an isolated retina of a baby about 18 weeks gestation. This cell line was made to be ‘immortal’ but failed. It caused cancerous tumors in mice. Was used in the HIV vaccine trial but caused cancer so it was pulled. Crucell-advent of their PER C6 fetal cell line took off. PER C6 is a normal cell that has been modified to resist cell senescence. In doing so, it introduces the potential for cancer to form in the vaccine recipient.
☀WI-26 VA4
An SV40 transformed derivative of WI-26, a human diploid cell line derived from embryonic lung tissue of a male Caucasian. The cells have SV40 T-Ag but infectious virus has not been rescued.
☀WALVAX2
Recently developed from the lung tissue of a 3 month gestation baby girl. To replace the current MERC-5 and WI-38 which are depleting.
To obtain all these, the scientists had to be present at the time of the abortion because "In order to sustain 96% of the cells, the live tissue would need to be preserved within 5 minutes of the abortion"-Dr. C. Ward Kischer.
And it's still happening today. Notice again the last listed: WALVAX2. This is a brand new line in which 9 babies died in the making and the baby ultimately used was intentionally delivered alive in the sac for best harvesting. This is going to be the New MMR.
http://www.lifenews.com/2015/09/09/scientists-in-china-create-new-vaccines-using-body-parts-from-nine-aborted-babies/
And it will admittedly continue. PBS recently reports on how fetal tissue is VITAL to vaccine and drug development:
http://www.pbs.org/newshour/rundown/medical-researchers-say-fetal-tissue-remains-essential/
There are 271 vaccines (and 85 drugs) in the pipeline awaiting approvals that we cannot see the ingredients too yet but you can bet they include fetal lines just like our current ones do:
http://phrma.org/medicines-in-development-for-vaccines-2013
http://soundchoice.org/aborted-fetal-products/
WALVAX 2 is taken from the lung tissue of a 3 month gestation female who was ultimately selected from among 9 aborted BABIES. The scientists noted how they followed specific guidelines to mimic WI-38 and MRC-5 in selecting the aborted babies, ranging from 2-4 months gestation. They further noted how they induced labor using a “water bag” abortion to shorten the delivery time and PREVENT THE DEATH OF THE FETUS to ensure LIVE intact organs which were immediately sent to the labs for cell preparation.
Keep telling yourself that this is ok..."for the greater good". This can be done without murdering babies. It's done all the time without murdering babies....Just not when the cdc can profit from it in the U.S. This practice is disgusting. Did you know that fragmented fetal DNA has been proven to combine with vaccine recipient DNA permanently altering that child's DNA? Did you know that the study to prove this and show the link between this fractional DNA and childhood Leukemia is currently underway? Its actually proven, but in order to get a peer reviewed study to the public is not so easy. Very rich people will lose a lot of money. That's what happens when you let the cdc OWN vaccine patents, make profits from vaccines, and then also police themselves.
And please heavily consider the part that explains that these new vaccine cell lines are being made in China...they currently ship us fish farmed in feces, toys with high lead content, and plastic rice...Do you really think they are concerned about your family's safety?
Not only that but did you know....
They found intact human male DNA-- not even in fragments. The whole genome was found in the MMR-V. This was confirmed to be the DNA of the aborted male child called "MRC-5" that is listed as a vaccine ingredient.
Click: https://www.corvelva.it/en/speciale-corvelva/vaccinegate-en/what-did-we-find-in-the-mmrv-priorix-tetra-vaccine.html
https://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/pubs/pinkbook/downloads/appendices/b/excipient-table-2.pdf
https://youtu.be/YpRAbfhIhlo
The use of aborted fetal cells in Covid vaccines:
https://cogforlife.org/wp-content/uploads/CovidCompareMoralImmoral.pdf
https://www.greenmedinfo.com/blog/pro-life-and-pro-vaccine-ultimate-hypocrisy
https://www.facebook.com/thewilddoctn/videos/225282309036772/
Medical professionals are supposed to report all adverse events *BY LAW*, but Harvard researchers were hired by the CDC to analyze the reporting to VAERS(Vaxine Adverse Event Reporting System, the passive surveillance system established to monitor vaxine injury/death). Their preliminary findings were that less than 1% of vaxine reactions are ever reported. After this was relayed to the CDC, all correspondence halted and the project was left to be forgotten. https://cfvsa.org/less_than_1/
Medical professionals are not the the only people who can report to VAERS, though. We, the people, can report for ourselves too.. and I highly encourage you to do so if you experience a reaction of any kind.
Instructions for reporting👉🏻 https://vaers.hhs.gov/esubhelp.html
Reporting your adverse event👉🏻 https://vaers.hhs.gov/reportevent.html
Bear in mind that the following are all valid reactions post vaxination:
•fever
•redness, swelling, or heat at the injection site
•fatigue, malaise, or lethargy
•dizziness or vertigo
•vomiting
•diarrhea
•Incontinence
•sudden onset of rashes
•headaches
•body aches
•C/V symptoms
The following text are not my words.
"Pfizer’s 53 page C/V vaxine document released today. It DOES NOT prevent C/V infection or spread of the disease. Masks and social-distancing are still required.
Please note on Page 2 below that of the 3410 individuals who got C/V during the study, almost half were from the vaxinated group. The vaxine did not prevent infection!
Below is the working list from the FDA for the adverse effects they plan to monitor for after release of the c/v vaccine(s) with the link for you to confirm for yourself. https://www.fda.gov/media/143557/download
•Guillain-Barré syndrome
•Acute disseminated encephalomyelitis
•Transverse myelitis
•Encephalitis/myelitis/encephalomyelitis/
meningoencephalitis/meningitis/
encepholapathy
•Convulsions/seizures
•Stroke
•Narcolepsy and cataplexy
•Anaphylaxis
•Acute myocardial infarction
•Myocarditis/pericarditis
•Autoimmune disease
•Deaths
•Pregnancy and birth outcomes
•Other acute demyelinating diseases
•Non-anaphylactic allergic reactions
•Thrombocytopenia
•Disseminated intravascular coagulation
•Venous thromboembolism
•Arthritis and arthralgia/joint pain
•Kawasaki disease
•Multisystem Inflammatory Syndrome
in Children
•Vac xine enhanced disease
***If your eyes are opening to the insanity of this vac xine logic, please revisit the idea of childhood vac xines. Take a look at the infections, the treatments, the outcomes, the vac xine risks, etc.
For those looking for data on the Moderna C/V vac xine...
-45 participants age 18-55
-20 participants age 56-70
-20 participants age 71 or older
-Out of 193 potential participants, only 85 were deemed acceptable.
To be acceptable you can not have ANY MEDICAL condition, must have perfect BMI, and perfect blood pressure measurements. 56% of the people who applied were rejected.
Here's the results of the perfectly healthy ideal 85 people:
Age 18-55: 71% OF PARTICIPANTS HAD AN ADVERSE REACTION
Age 56-70: 50% OF PARTICIPANTS HAD AN ADVERSE REACTION
Age 71+: 70% OF PARTICIPANTS HAD AN ADVERSE REACTION
How on earth is the general population (the 56% rejected for not being healthy enough) supposed to get this?
https://www.fda.gov/media/144245/download"
-Kasey McInis Powell
THINK YOU HAD ALL BETTER READ THIS:
Pay attention:
"I'm not a conspiracy theorist, I have a PhD in computer science my partner has a PhD in Chemistry, based on research in the area of Biological Synthesis of Pharmaceutically Active Molecules
All of those considering taking, or being bribed into taking this vaccine, with the promise of freedoms restored that you already had and have conceded...
1) You do realise this is not a normal vaccine, yes?
2) You recognise that this permanently and irreversibly changes your DNA?
3) You fully understand that this has never been done before in the history of mankind and there is not a single person on this planet who truly knows what the outcome is?
4) You are totally aware, that if anything does go wrong, you have no come back and cannot be treated?
Just checking you know what I know, Also if you still think Covid is real and very dangerous then ask yourself these questions;
Why are GP's not isolating? dying?
Why are frontline staff not isolating? dying?
Why are police officers not isolating? dying?
Why are soldiers not isolating? dying?
Why are bus drivers not isolating? dying?
Why are most hospitals empty?
Why are testing centres empty?
Why is it that 96% of people testing positive are mask wearers?
Why is it bacterial pneumonia is on the rise because of mask wearing? Yet it's kept hush hush.
Why is it that large conglomerates can stay open whilst small businesses of the same industry are bullied into shutting?
Why is it that the BBC was funded by Bill Gates to peddle pro Covid propaganda?
Why is it that the biggest censorship campaign is now in force?
Why is it that if you even question the narrative you believe the earth is flat and that lizard people exist?
Why is it that the 'Great Reset' is being openly advertised yet people still deny it?
Why is it that in Wuhan people were dropping dead in the streets yet it's happening nowhere else?
Why is it that the mainstream media are using crisis actors and dummies to peddle fear?
Why is it that our police force has undergone a huge militarisation?
Why has police brutality skyrocketed?
Why are the fact-check websites funded by the same elites that are funding the media for pro covid propaganda?
Why is Google blacklisting well documented science that disproves all this pro covid science?
Why is Google blacklisting anything that questions the narrative?
If this virus was so deadly then why;
Would you need a test to tell you that you've got it?
Why are graveyards and crematoriums not overflowing?
Why are hospitals not overwhelmed to the point of everything else is fully cancelled?
Why are people not dropping dead like in Wuhan?
Why do you need an app to tell you to isolate?
Why has China gone back to 'normal' without a vaccine?
Why has Covid-19 never been isolated?
"Hell on earth is looking in the mirror and wondering what could of been"
The next stage of the Covid1984 Operation is to "deploy" the vaccine amongst the public.
The "authorities" know that a lot of people who accept the lockdown measures and who accept wearing masks to "protect the common good" are unhappy about having rushed vaccine injected into them.
So to deter them the media is now in over drive to portray those with reservations as "dangerous anti-vaxxers". Despite the fact that a lot of people with reservations are not anti vax, not anti science, not anti medicine or pharmacetical drugs. They're just anti not having a choice about whether to have this vaccine or not.
By labelling all Covid Vacine hesitant or refusers as crazed anti science conpiracy theorists it creates an US vs Them dialectic that will then be used to create a conflict where those who say no to the vaccine will be blamed by those content to roll up their sleeves and have it for preventing the country from moving out of rolling lockdowns and "back to normal".
Articles like this are programming the minds of people in society to "choose a side" which can then be pitted against each other and via the divide and rule technique ultimately control us all. How about we respect one another's right to choose what we do with our own bodies and decide for ourselves whether we have the vaccine or not rather than force one another's choice on the other instead?
They are called "our own bodies" for a reason.... we own our own bodies. Our bodies are our property and as such no one else has the right to tell us what we should put in or on our bodies. Those claiming that right are saying in not so many words that they own us and have the right to control us against our wishes as that is....slavery.
So ‘Moderna’ have come out with a better vaccine which is 95% effective ....
Remember my prediction back in April? I said out of hundreds of companies across the world, Moderna will be the ones who bring this vaccine to market!! 📷 How do we know this? 📷
Because it’s all planned!! Moderna have NEVER brought a human vaccine to market before, they are also using RNA which has NEVER been used in vaccines before and they were bailed out of bankruptcy in 2010 by wait for it Dr Fauci and Gates!! (Year might be wrong but it’s close)
Shall I tell you why I think they’ve never brought a human vaccine to market b4. I think it’s because they never planned too, look at their name ‘MOD e RNA’ they specialise in modifying DNA by using RNA!
They have been waiting for this moment for years!!! The time has come ... no one knows what the side effects will be after a few years (I have my own idea what will happen when you mix a virus with human dna but I’ll leave it there for now)
Please just look things up for yourself, start with the history and set up of the MSM because knowing they’re lying to you is step 1.
Things are going to be hard for the ones who don’t accept this vaccine but no one should sell their soul to the devil (literally)."
Keep safe people!
Dr. Wesley A Kitikonti
Dear Patients and Friends,
Last week I must have been asked 20 times about the new COVID vaccines. Here are my thoughts. Please pass this information onto many as you can. People need to have fully informed consent when it comes to injecting foreign genetic material into their bodies.
1. The COVID vaccines are mRNA vaccines. mRNA vaccines are a completely new type of vaccine. No mRNA vaccine has ever been licensed for human use before. In essence, we have absolutely no idea what to expect from this vaccine. We have no idea if it will be effective or safe.
2. Traditional vaccine simply introduce pieces of a virus to stimulate an immune reaction. The new mRNA vaccine is completely different. It actually injects (transfects) molecules of synthetic genetic material from non-humans sources into our cells. Once in the cells, the genetic material interacts with our transfer RNA (tRNA) to make a foreign protein that supposedly teaches the body to destroy the virus being coded for. Note that these newly created proteins are not regulated by our own DNA, and are thus completely foreign to our cells. What they are fully capable of doing is unknown.
3. The mRNA molecule is vulnerable to destruction. So, in order to protect the fragile mRNA strands while they are being inserted into our DNA they are coated with PEGylated lipid nanoparticles. This coating hides the mRNA from our immune system which ordinarily would kill any foreign material injected into the body. PEGylated lipid nanoparticles have been used in several different drugs for years. Because of their effect on immune system balance, several studies have shown them to induce allergies and autoimmune diseases. Additionally, PEGylated lipid nanoparticles have been shown to trigger their own immune reactions, and to cause damage to the liver.
4. These new vaccines are additionally contaminated with aluminum, mercury, and possibly formaldehyde. The manufacturers have not yet disclosed what other toxins they contain.
5. Since viruses mutate frequently, the chance of any vaccine working for more than a year is unlikely. That is why the flu vaccine changes every year. Last year’s vaccine is no more valuable than last year’s newspaper.
6. Absolutely no long term safety studies will have been done to ensure that any of these vaccines don’t cause the cancer, seizures, heart disease, allergies, and autoimmune diseases seen with other vaccines. If you ever wanted to be guinea pig for Big Pharma, now is your golden opportunity.
7. Many experts question whether the mRNA technology is ready for prime time. In November 2020, Dr. Peter Jay Hotez said of the new mRNA vaccines, "I worry about innovation at the expense of practicality because they [the mRNA vaccines] are weighted toward technology platforms that have never made it to licensure before.” Dr. Hotez is Professor of Pediatrics and Molecular Virology & Microbiology at Baylor College of Medicine, where he is also Director of the Texas Children’s Hospital Center for Vaccine Development.
8. Michal Linial, PhD is a Professor of Biochemistry. Because of her research and forecasts on COVID-19, Dr. Linial has been widely quoted in the media. She recently stated, "I won't be taking it [the mRNA vaccine] immediately – probably not for at least the coming year. We have to wait and see whether it really works. We will have a safety profile for only a certain number of months, so if there is a long-term effect after two years, we cannot know."
9. In November 2020, The Washington Post reported on hesitancy among healthcare professionals in the United States to the mRNA vaccines, citing surveys which reported that: "some did not want to be in the first round, so they could wait and see if there are potential side effects", and that "doctors and nurses want more data before championing vaccines to end the pandemic".
10. Since the death rate from COVID resumed to the normal flu death rate way back in early September, the pandemic has been over since then. Therefore, at this point in time no vaccine is needed. The current scare tactics regarding “escalating cases” is based on a PCR test that because it exceeds 34 amplifications has a 100% false positive rate unless it is performed between the 3rd and 5th day after the first day of symptoms. It is therefor 100% inaccurate in people with no symptoms. This is well established in the scientific literature. See the attachment (False Positive PCR testing is up to 100%!) for more information on this. If you go to the CDC site (file:///C:/Users/docto/AppData/Local/Temp/cdc_97230_DS1.pdf ), you can see that the weekly death rates in the US are now lower than they normally are during an average flu season.
11. The other reason you don’t need a vaccine for COVID-19 is that substantial herd immunity has already taken place in the United States. This is the primary reason for the end of the pandemic.
12. Unfortunately, you cannot completely trust what you hear from the media. They have consistently got it wrong for the past year. Since they are all supported by Big Pharma and the other entities selling the COVID vaccines, they are not going to be fully forthcoming when it comes to mRNA vaccines. Every statement I have made here is fully backed by published scientific references.
13. I would be very interested to see verification that Bill and Melinda Gates with their entire family including grandchildren, Joe Biden and President Trump and their entire families, and Anthony Fauci and his entire family all get the vaccine.
14. Anyone who after reading all this still wants to get injected with the mRNA vaccine, should at the very least have their blood checked for COVID-19 antibodies. There is no need for a vaccine in persons already naturally immunized. Here's my bottom line: I would much rather get a COVID infection than get a COVID vaccine. That would be safer and more effective. I have had a number of COVID positive flu cases this year. Some were old and had health concerns. Every single one has done really well with natural therapies including ozone therapy and IV vitamin C. Just because modern medicine has no effective treatment for viral infections, doesn’t mean that there isn’t one.
Yours Always,
Frank Shallenberger, MD, HMD
"The shocking reason why Pfizer’s coronavirus vaccine requires storage at -70C … because it contains experimental nanotech components that have NEVER been used in vaccines before.
Pfizer’s new coronavirus vaccine requires storage at -70C (-94F), which is much colder than the North Pole. If it’s not stored at this temperature, its ingredients begin to break down and it fails to work. Currently Pfizer is claiming, without evidence, that its vaccine is “90% effective.” But this claim is little more than corporate propaganda designed to drive up stock prices through false projections.
But why do these vaccines need to be kept at -70C in the first place?
The answer, it turns out, is because they contain potentially hazardous ingredients that have never been used in vaccines before.
As Children’s Health Defense explained in an August 6th article, “mRNA vaccines undergoing Covid-19 clinical trials, including the Moderna vaccine, rely on a nanoparticle-based “carrier system” containing a synthetic chemical called polyethylene glycol (PEG).”
CHD goes on to explain:
The use of PEG in drugs and vaccines is increasingly controversial due to the well-documented incidence of adverse PEG-related immune reactions, including life-threatening anaphylaxis.
Roughly seven in ten Americans may already be sensitized to PEG, which may result in reduced efficacy of the vaccine and an increase in adverse side effects.
If a PEG-containing mRNA vaccine for Covid-19 gains FDA approval, the uptick in exposure to PEG will be unprecedented—and potentially disastrous.
Moderna documents and publications indicate that the company is well aware of safety risks associated with PEG and other aspects of its mRNA technology but is more concerned with its bottom line.
Lipid nanoparticles cause hyperinflammatory responses in the body, leading to severe reactions, hospitalization and potentially DEATH
Why are LNPs (Lipid Nanoparticles) used in these vaccines? As CHD further explains:
LNPs “encapsulate the mRNA constructs to protect them from degradation and promote cellular uptake” and, additionally, rev up the immune system (a property that vaccine scientists tamely describe as LNPs’ “inherent adjuvant properties”)
In other words, the LNPs are adjuvants, meaning they are designed to cause hyperinflammatory responses in human beings, once injected. This is done in an effort to induce the creation of antibodies that then allow the vaccine manufacturer to claim high “effectiveness” rates, even when those very same adjuvants cause severe adverse reactions.
According to recent vaccine trials conducted by Moderna, 100% of human subjects in the high-dose vaccine trial group experienced adverse reactions." Thanks, Tasha Clayton Dennis
Buyer beware!
“Breaking news! The UK's NHS has pivoted after just ONE DAY of vaccinating staff...
These people would be dead if it weren't for the epinephrine they were carrying.”
https://www.theguardian.com/world/2020/dec/09/pfizer-covid-vaccine-nhs-extreme-allergy-sufferers-regulators-reaction
(Via @HearThisWell)
The vaccine doesn't stop infection or transmission. May extend shedding for months.
https://theconversation.com/whats-the-difference-between-viral-shedding-and-reinfection-with-covid-19-150547
There are SO SO MANY people that are NOT SUPPOSED to get this, according to the manufacturer and governments BUT I haven't seen even one of those go public with it. I did...
https://www.bitchute.com/video/1InLihkV5coO/
The C/V Vax is being distributed in every city in the US. I want to take the time to remind you all to PLEASE report ANY reactions you experience post vaxine via the VAERS reporting system.
Medical professionals are supposed to report all adverse events *BY LAW*, but Harvard researchers were hired by the CDC to analyze the reporting to VAERS(Vaxine Adverse Event Reporting System, the passive surveillance system established to monitor vaxine injury/death). Their preliminary findings were that less than 1% of vaxine reactions are ever reported. After this was relayed to the CDC, all correspondence halted and the project was left to be forgotten. https://cfvsa.org/less_than_1/
Medical professionals are not the the only people who can report to VAERS, though. We, the people, can report for ourselves too.. and I highly encourage you to do so if you experience a reaction of any kind.
Instructions for reporting👉🏻 https://vaers.hhs.gov/esubhelp.html
Reporting your adverse event👉🏻 https://vaers.hhs.gov/reportevent.html
Bear in mind that the following are all valid reactions post vaxination:
•fever
•redness, swelling, or heat at the injection site
•fatigue, malaise, or lethargy
•dizziness or vertigo
•vomiting
•diarrhea
•Incontinence
•sudden onset of rashes
•headaches
•body aches
•C/V symptoms
The following text are not my words.
"Pfizer’s 53 page C/V vaxine document released today. It DOES NOT prevent C/V infection or spread of the disease. Masks and social-distancing are still required.
Please note on Page 2 below that of the 3410 individuals who got C/V during the study, almost half were from the vaxinated group. The vaxine did not prevent infection!
Below is the working list from the FDA for the adverse effects they plan to monitor for after release of the c/v vaccine(s) with the link for you to confirm for yourself. https://www.fda.gov/media/143557/download
•Guillain-Barré syndrome
•Acute disseminated encephalomyelitis
•Transverse myelitis
•Encephalitis/myelitis/encephalomyelitis/
meningoencephalitis/meningitis/
encepholapathy
•Convulsions/seizures
•Stroke
•Narcolepsy and cataplexy
•Anaphylaxis
•Acute myocardial infarction
•Myocarditis/pericarditis
•Autoimmune disease
•Deaths
•Pregnancy and birth outcomes
•Other acute demyelinating diseases
•Non-anaphylactic allergic reactions
•Thrombocytopenia
•Disseminated intravascular coagulation
•Venous thromboembolism
•Arthritis and arthralgia/joint pain
•Kawasaki disease
•Multisystem Inflammatory Syndrome
in Children
•Vac xine enhanced disease
***If your eyes are opening to the insanity of this vac xine logic, please revisit the idea of childhood vac xines. Take a look at the infections, the treatments, the outcomes, the vac xine risks, etc.
For those looking for data on the Moderna C/V vac xine...
-45 participants age 18-55
-20 participants age 56-70
-20 participants age 71 or older
-Out of 193 potential participants, only 85 were deemed acceptable.
To be acceptable you can not have ANY MEDICAL condition, must have perfect BMI, and perfect blood pressure measurements. 56% of the people who applied were rejected.
Here's the results of the perfectly healthy ideal 85 people:
Age 18-55: 71% OF PARTICIPANTS HAD AN ADVERSE REACTION
Age 56-70: 50% OF PARTICIPANTS HAD AN ADVERSE REACTION
Age 71+: 70% OF PARTICIPANTS HAD AN ADVERSE REACTION
How on earth is the general population (the 56% rejected for not being healthy enough) supposed to get this?
https://www.fda.gov/media/144245/download"
-Kasey McInis Powell
https://lbry.tv/@ceylon:1/100-out-of-100-dead-from-the-vax:1
https://www.fda.gov/media/144413/download
What's your favorite part of the new COVID-19 vaccine?
A.) You can still spread the virus
B.) 2 month immunity
C.) 10-15% reaction rate
D.) Increased HIV risk
E.) Bell's palsy
F.) Anaphylaxis
G.) No manufacturer liability
H.) Still have to wear a mask
I.) All of the above
Links 📝
A.) The Moderna vaccine may not prevent infection or transmission of COVID-19:
https://www.businessinsider.com/moderna-chief-medical-officer-vaccines-interview-2020-11
B.) COVID-19 vaccine will keep you immune for 2 months, NCDHHS says. https://www.cbs17.com/news/north-carolina-news/vaccine-will-keep-you-immune-for-2-months-ncdhhs-says/
C.) 10-15% reaction rate in healthy test subjects. https://www.cnbc.com/2020/12/01/trump-covid-vaccine-czar-says-side-effects-significantly-noticeable-in-10percent-to-15percent-of-recipients.html
D.) Some of the Covid-19 vaccines currently in development could increase the risk of acquiring HIV. https://www.forbes.com/sites/roberthart/2020/10/20/researchers-warn-some-covid-19-vaccines-could-increase-risk-of-hiv-infection/?sh=537f79d53740
E.) FDA staff recommends watching for Bell's palsy in Moderna and Pfizer vaccine recipients. https://www.cnbc.com/2020/12/15/fda-staff-recommends-watching-for-bells-palsy-in-moderna-and-pfizer-vaccine-recipients.html
F.) NHS told not to give Covid vaccine to those with history of allergic reactions. https://www.theguardian.com/world/2020/dec/09/pfizer-covid-vaccine-nhs-extreme-allergy-sufferers-regulators-reaction?fbclid=IwAR2hxGjy9RW85VLdwP5nQIvKEQlUfX1GPNmz3UDqaL_-KpV8a_btBONqZuU
G.) You can’t sue Pfizer or Moderna if you have severe Covid vaccine side effects. The government likely won't compensate you for damages either. https://www.cnbc.com/2020/12/16/covid-vaccine-side-effects-compensation-lawsuit.html
H.) Here’s Why Vaccinated People Still Need to Wear a Mask: https://www.nytimes.com/2020/12/08/health/covid-vaccine-mask.html
As of Friday afternoon, the CDC had already learned of 3,150 people who'd received the vaccine had already been "unable to perform normal daily activities, unable to work, [or] required care from doctor or health care professional".
That figure supposedly represented about 1.5% of the 215,000 vaccine recipients. Not really, through. Vaccinations increased exponentially last week; on Friday alone, 127,000 people were vaccinated.
Unless people had and reported adverse events IMMEDIATELY. The denominator is far lower than 215,000 (the numerator will have a lag too, but the other way). If the lag is one day, almost 4% of the first 88,000 recipients have had a serious adverse event - AFTER THE FIRST SHOT OF THE PFIZER VACCINE.
Remember, the Moderna vaccine is worse, and the second shot is much worse. Also of note - hospitalizations or physicians' care are included here, but not broken out separately. They should be.
@AlexBerenson via Twitter
https://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/acip/meetings/downloads/slides-2020-12/slides-12-19/05-COVID-CLARK.pdf
“Severe allergy-like reactions in at least eight people who received the COVID-19 vaccine produced by Pfizer and BioNTech over the past 2 weeks may be due to a compound in the packaging of the messenger RNA (mRNA) that forms the vaccine’s main ingredient, scientists say. A similar mRNA vaccine developed by Moderna, which was authorized for emergency use in the United States on Friday, also contains the compound, polyethylene glycol (PEG).
PEG has never been used before in an approved vaccine, but it is found in many drugs that have occasionally triggered anaphylaxis—a potentially life-threatening reaction that can cause rashes, a plummeting blood pressure, shortness of breath, and a fast heartbeat. Some allergists and immunologists believe a small number of people previously exposed to PEG may have high levels of antibodies against PEG, putting them at risk of an anaphylactic reaction to the vaccine.”
https://www.sciencemag.org/news/2020/12/suspicions-grow-nanoparticles-pfizer-s-covid-19-vaccine-trigger-rare-allergic-reactions?fbclid=IwAR3olT3XgRhmDmjJjIN_Gc85sjidIGwY_aRL2c6uEuRg6dZETSh3HhSicMg
UK’s Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency:
“Vaccination should only be carried out in facilities where resuscitation measures are available.”
https://www.theguardian.com/world/2020/dec/09/pfizer-covid-vaccine-nhs-extreme-allergy-sufferers-regulators-reaction?fbclid=IwAR0elkSarzGCrFSSlKBlGX6CC83buwvyy8SVJUAOSBPdw4C1MwyQWhLez9A
America:
Let’s have Walmart administer Covid-19 vaccinations across the country 😀
https://www.cnbc.com/quotes/?symbol=WMT
“The health center said as of Friday, three team members are at home and "doing well," while one person is receiving additional treatment.
"Reactions are an expected side effect of vaccination. We are encouraged by our team members who are eager to get the vaccine to help protect themselves and others and bring an end to this pandemic," Advocate Aurora Health said.”
https://www.nbcchicago.com/news/local/suburban-hospital-suspends-covid-19-vaccinations-after-adverse-reactions/2398756/
It’s not mandatory.... except they want proof to have access to move freely.
https://www.nytimes.com/2020/12/13/technology/coronavirus-vaccine-apps.html?smid=fb-share&fbclid=IwAR1ijo3UMGxyT_Ls2Mobj3-VTaLhEROkGOpIskCdoCVzVC_9FvOQ99LGCEE
Start watching at 13 minutes in. A nurse receives the new covid vaccine and as she’s answering questions, she passes out.
📝 Per Pfizer's documents, syncope (fainting) occurs in .02% of people.
📝 If 30% of the population gets this vaccine, that means about 2,000 people will faint like this.
https://www.facebook.com/WRCBtv/videos/166287281903301/
“He said it’s important the public understands Bell’s palsy is just a "bogeyman side effect” and shouldn’t prevent someone from getting the COVID-19 vaccine.”
https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/health/2020/12/15/pfizer-moderna-covid-vaccine-trials-and-bells-palsy-what-it/3904994001/
==> FORCED COVID VACCINES MUST BE PROHIBITED !!
As State Representative, I'm fighting to maintain our God-given individual liberties and parental rights. I support informed consent and empowering each person to choose what is best for themselves and their families.
The State of New York is already floating the idea of forced vaccinations. With COVID vaccines beginning to be administered Monday, I expect it won't be too long before Democrats propose something similar in MN.
One of the bills I'm introducing in Monday's special session would prohibit the governor from further abusing his emergency powers to force vaccinations against an individual's consent.
https://www.fox5ny.com/news/new-york-legislation-would-make-covid-19-vaccination-mandatory
The world's largest vaccine producer, Serum Institute of India, has sued a COVID-19 vaccine trial participant who alleged that the trial caused him “serious side effects”.
https://www.vice.com/en/article/pkdkbg/participant-from-oxfords-covid-19-vaccine-trial-alleges-serious-side-effects?fbclid=IwAR0gxCUesaZ2yUk7TF1HznAQ4431TQt8ndITvdo7D2fHL1Vr3GJ5VXEdgvc
Six people died in Pfizer’s late-stage trial of the COVID-19 vaccine, the US Food and Drug Administration has revealed just hours after Britain became the first country in the world to roll out the vaccine.
But the deaths are said to raise no new safety issues or questions about the vaccine’s effectiveness because all represented events that occurred in the general population at a similar rate, the FDA concluded.
https://thenewdaily.com.au/news/coronavirus/2020/12/09/pfizer-oxford-astrazeneca-vaccines/
Notice the ratio of people with reactions from the list given in the article (per the manufacturer), 2 of them with life threatening allergic reactions, and ask yourself these 3 core questions (you can definitely add more):
- What are the reactions that aren't on the list, but are likely to happen in real world settings? It's never the same as a controlled experiment.
- How many people, especially in the younger adult, adolescent and children populations have severe allergies? (Also how many people would be primed for them after receiving this intervention?)
- What is my personal risk-benefit analysis between the disease and it's preventive pharmaceutical solution? (what do I know about the syndrome, it's lethality in my age group, risk factors, treatments, prevention, my health in general and how it would be affected by going through the disease vs it being impacted by this intervention, etc).
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-9034115/Allergy-risk-Pfizer-jab-TWO-patients-fall-ill-V-Day-rollout.html
We said it was coming. Covid and distance learning has emboldened mandate politics. Oregon just had a new mandate bill file to remove exemptions for all in person learning and events.
https://olis.leg.state.or.us/liz/2019I1/Downloads/CommitteeMeetingDocument/227069?fbclid=IwAR1etK90xiS83Pf0bN3rgS6K6bb0U0v2cF7LeOEV-wTyv-j14iljwm_Izgo
They’re coming for you, Adults. Are you ready to defend freedom now?
Link to bill: https://www.nysenate.gov/legislation/bills/2019/A11179
“One of the things we want to make sure people understand is that they should not be unnecessarily alarmed if there are reports, once we start vaccinating, of someone or multiple people dying within a day or two of their vaccination who are residents of a long-term care facility. That would be something we would expect, as a normal occurrence, because people die frequently in nursing homes."
https://www.gwinnettdailypost.com/features/health/why-vaccinate-our-most-frail-odd-vote-out-shows-the-dilemma/article_25ae0c6e-eb61-54ec-9877-c22ff46a3a48.html
https://www.lifesitenews.com/news/pfizer-coronavirus-vaccine-not-safe-for-pregnant-or-breastfeeding-mums-potential-danger-for-fertility
To paraphrase The Matrix:
"Tell me, Mr. Anderson, what good is a jab, if it's unable to prevent transmission...?" 😶
"In a list of interview highlights released before the special, Holt asked Bourla, “Even though I’ve had the protection, am I still able to transmit it to other people?”
“I think this is something that needs to be examined. We are not certain about that right now with what we know,” Bourla responded."
"""Safe and effective"""
https://thehill.com/news-by-subject/healthcare/528619-pfizer-chairman-were-not-sure-if-someone-can-transmit-virus-after
As the U.S. Food and Drug Administration weighs whether to issue an emergency use authorization for a coronavirus vaccine, Defense Department officials say the inoculations will remain voluntary once the FDA gives the OK.
https://www.military.com/daily-news/2020/11/23/now-us-troops-wont-be-required-get-new-covid-19-vaccine.html?fbclid=IwAR2FLZh1vqsmFvRgNjAH0laXS-SKMlf6CZmU24RvJlgGxt_-F-WEo49H01U
https://www.cnbc.com/2020/12/03/1500-stimulus-checks-for-covid-19-shots-how-one-plan-would-work.html?__source=sharebar|facebook&par=sharebar
This has always been relevant, and now it's more relevant than ever before since the post-WW2 trials, not only in the context of all of us being de-facto research subjects, but also since manufacturers conducting the current expedited trials are attacking research subjects for reporting about the side effects they have experienced, which prevents the rest of us from ever being able to have Informed Consent.
"Medical Ethics and Human Rights
The judges at Nuremberg, although they realized the importance of Hippocratic ethics and the maxim primum non nocere, recognized that more was necessary to protect human research subjects. Accordingly, the judges articulated a sophisticated set of 10 research principles centered not on the physician but on the research subject. These principles, which we know as the Nuremberg Code, included a new, comprehensive, and absolute requirement of informed consent (principle 1), and a new right of the subject to withdraw from participation in an experiment (principle 9). The judges adopted much of the language proposed by Alexander and Ivy but were more emphatic about the necessity and attributes of the subject's consent and explicitly added the subject's right to withdraw.
https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJM199711133372006
https://www.sciencemag.org/news/2020/12/suspicions-grow-nanoparticles-pfizer-s-covid-19-vaccine-trigger-rare-allergic-reactions
I saw this statement and didn’t believe it true until I watched the video below of RFK interviewing her. This statement is at minute 12:10ish.
This is heartbreaking. 🙏🏼
https://youtu.be/KL0iU6owbeE
https://www.bitchute.com/video/nlLNbbVHvyXh/
https://www.nytimes.com/2020/12/16/health/covid-pfizer-vaccine-allergic-reaction.html
https://standforhealthfreedom.com/blog/5-reasons-vaccine-must-be-voluntary/?utm_campaign=Daily%20Newsletter%3A%20Five%20Reasons%20Why%20The%20Coronavirus%20Vaccine%20Must%20Be%20Voluntary%20%28TggqLb%29&utm_medium=email&utm_source=Daily%20Newsletter&_ke=eyJrbF9jb21wYW55X2lkIjogIksydlhBeSIsICJrbF9lbWFpbCI6ICJrYXJpQGthcmlraW5kZW0uY29tIn0%3D
https://www.nexusnewsfeed.com/article/human-rights/unlike-uk-us-fda-allows-pregnant-and-lactating-women-to-receive-experimental-pfizer-covid-vaccine/#.X9bkgu-svws.facebook
https://apple.news/AWlA7oQS7TPGQgwzBG21cbQ
https://thevaccinereaction.org/2020/12/covid-19-vaccine-trial-volunteer-in-india-develops-encephalopathy-and-sues/
https://thevaccinereaction.org/2020/12/over-3000-health-impact-events-after-covid-19-mrna-vaccinations/
https://thevaccinereaction.org/2020/12/peruvian-man-suffers-guillain-barre-like-symptoms-after-receiving-sinopharm-covid-19-vaccine/
https://thevaccinereaction.org/2020/11/coronavirus-vaccine-why-its-important-to-know-whats-in-the-placebo-2/
https://thevaccinereaction.org/2020/11/how-covid-19-vaccine-trials-are-designed/
https://thevaccinereaction.org/2020/11/airline-industry-develops-travel-pass-to-test-require-covid-19-vaccinations-to-fly/
https://thevaccinereaction.org/2020/10/pfizer-wants-to-use-children-in-covid-19-vaccine-clinical-trial/
https://thevaccinereaction.org/2020/12/severe-allergic-reactions-reported-after-pfizer-biontech-covid-19-vaccinations/
https://thevaccinereaction.org/2020/12/pfizer-moderna-covid-19-vaccines-produce-significantly-noticeable-side-effects-in-up-to-15-percent-of-users/
https://thevaccinereaction.org/2020/11/government-proposes-making-it-harder-to-get-vaccine-injury-compensation/
https://thevaccinereaction.org/2020/12/russians-warned-to-abstain-from-drinking-alcohol-after-getting-sputnik-v-covid-19-vaccine/
https://news.ucmerced.edu/news/2020/breast-milk-shows-promise-treating-covid-19-and-protecting-babies
COVID, PATERNALISM & THE DEATH OF PATIENT AUTONOMY
“A year ago, if you had asked me if most doctors respected their patients’ wishes, I would have answered with a resounding yes. If you had asked me if medicine had divorced its paternalistic roots when physicians trampled over ideals like patient autonomy and non-malfeasance, I would have said yes. But that was last year, and in this new world of Covid, panic, hysteria, and ever-present claims of just ‘following the science,’ as if it is the second coming of Jesus, I no longer can say these things. A 2012 review published in the AMA Journal of Ethics argued that modern medical practice methods had shifted from paternalistic to respect for patient autonomy. I have spent six years going through my MD-PhD training, where I have received sermons about how ‘sacred’ the Hippocratic oath is, how patient ‘autonomy’ is paramount. But in today’s day and age, ‘science’ is bandied about like the latest diet fad or catch-all religion, and deniers are the cavemen of yesteryear. ‘Science’ is now used to justify reprehensible and frankly ridiculous, non-evidence-based actions by politicians and physicians alike. Established and validated hierarchies for data quality have been thrown out with the proverbial bathwater, and policies surrounding medical care now violate the very core principles every physician swore to uphold.
I would argue that the two single most intimate moments in life occur when one enters this world and when one leaves it. No other events have the same weight, finality, or are as lasting as birth and death. These two experiences used to be treated with a sense of dignity and respect. There was humanity in them. At least there was before these ‘unprecedented’ times. Now the ‘standard of care’ is the use of restrictive hospital policies that prevent parents from being present for the birth of their children and for caring for them in the hospital. At the other end of the spectrum, you do not even have to dig for evidence. Almost every Covid patient dying in the hospital will die alone. Their final moments will not be shared with the family. Rather, their suffering will be broadcast on an unencrypted zoom call for the world to see. A zoom call hosted from an iPad on a stick held through the door, just waiting for another zoom bomb episode. No holding of hands and coming together for support. Instead, the family is denied their choice and forced to wait for the prehistoric hospital Wi-Fi network to ‘buffer.’ That is the best-case situation. Maybe something comes up, and you do not find out until the hospital finds the time to call.
I will acknowledge that most of these policies probably had no input from actual human beings like physicians or nurses. But every physician and nurse are complicit in them. You have allowed them to exist; you have not protested them; you have not fought them. And will bear the consequences of it, not the soulless administrators who devised them. And that is probably going to be the undoing of a good 100 years of hard work to earn the community’s trust. I know you all are heroes, working your butts off in ungodly conditions. I see the fear on your face, I see how hard you work, I see the good you do. But those families who you ripped apart? They will not see that. Those parents, they will not see that. I am going to be you, and if you did that to me, I would not see the good in you. All they will see is a patriarchal doctor who tore a hole in their lives, prevented the closure, the bonding, the healing they desperately needed. You used your position of power to literally rip parents away from their infants, to prevent working parents from ever seeing their children again. I might add that these policies are not even based on sound scientific reasoning and evidence. There has never been one randomized controlled trial showing that imprisoning dying patients saves lives and improves outcomes. I looked. There is not a single one.
These are moments that are seared into a person’s psyche for life. I understand there are significant risks involved, but these are decisions that the patient has the right to make, not you. We frequently allow patients to refuse lifesaving therapy, refuse to be vaccinated, and take whatever risks they want. We allow adults to make poor choices, and we also allow parents to make poor choices for their children. Why is this choice different? Is it because you are afraid of an inanimate object called SARS-CoV-2? Have you let that fear steal your humanity? Are you trying to be vindictive against a society that you feel has ignored your recommendations? I do not know.
Why now does the medical community get to decide that this one choice is beyond any patient’s capacity to make? Primum non nocere, First do no harm. Solitary confinement is widely considered to be a form of torture. I ask you, healers. Did you do any harm when you forced a patient to die in solitary confinement? Was that your choice to make? Or did you decide for them? I am not you; I cannot answer those questions for you. But I am sitting on the outside, reading the data, and weighing the quality. I am seeing your actions and hearing the stories. And from where I sit, I cannot help but feel I have just seen the death of patient autonomy and the phoenix-like rise of medical paternalism. I hope I am wrong, but the evidence says otherwise.”
—Garrett Jensen, a MD-PhD medical student
https://www.nbcchicago.com/news/local/suburban-hospital-suspends-covid-19-vaccinations-after-adverse-reactions/2398756/
2 out of 144 or 1 in 72...
Extrapolating: When 144,000 people get just the first dose of the coronavirus vaccine, we should expect to see 2,000 adverse outcomes.
Pfizer has announced the vaccine should be administered in places where those vaccinated can be treated for anaphylactic shock.
Does this risk seem acceptable to you?
“Vaccine Adverse Reaction Update
“The Bartlett Regional Hospital staff member and first known adverse allergic reaction to the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 vaccine in the U.S. is recovering and will remain another night in the hospital under observation. She is still encouraging her colleagues to get the vaccine.
“As per the CDC’s recommended method of vaccine administration, recipients are required to remain in place for 15 minutes after inoculation in the event any after effects arise. After 10 minutes, the Bartlett health care worker showed signs of an anaphylactic reaction, with increased heartbeat, shortness of breath and skin rash and redness. She was given epinephrine and Benadryl, admitted to the hospital, and put on an intravenous epinephrine drip.
“Her reaction was serious but not life threatening, said Emergency Department Medical Director Lindy Jones, MD. She had no known previous allergies or adverse reactions to vaccines.
“A second staff member experienced eye puffiness, light headedness, and scratchy throat ten minutes after being injected with the vaccine today. His reaction was not considered anaphylaxis. He was taken to the Emergency Department and administered epinephrine, Pepcid and Benadryl. He felt completely back to normal within an hour and was released. He too does not want his experience to have a negative impact on his colleagues lining up for the vaccine.
“Both incidents were reported to the CDC’s Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS) database. Bartlett Regional Hospital and The State of Alaska Department of Health and Social Services (DHSS) are in close communication with the CDC, and the agency is providing guidance and support.
“We were expecting these things and we had all the right systems in place,” said Infection Preventionist Charlee Gribbon.
“Gribbon is overseeing a mass operation to vaccinate as many staff as possible. Four hundred Bartlett staff signed up for the COVID-19 inoculation. Over the past 24 hours, 144 doses of the vaccine have been administered in Phase 1. Staff will receive their second booster dose in three weeks.
“Our goal is to be transparent with Alaskans and the public,” Alaska’s Chief Medical Officer Anne Zink said today. “We have no plans to change our vaccine schedule, dosing or regimen.”
“According to the latest story on this incident in the New York Times, “F.D.A. officials have said they would require Pfizer to increase its monitoring for anaphylaxis and submit data on it once the vaccine comes into use. Pfizer also said that the vaccine is recommended to be administered in settings that have access to equipment to manage anaphylaxis.”
Katie Bausler
Community Relations Director
Bartlett Regional Hospital
Office: 907-796-8567
Cell: 907-321-2755
[email protected]
BRH Newsroom
COVID-19 FAQs
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0946672X19305784
https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/17/22/8674/htm
https://www.jennifermargulis.net/books/the-vaccine-friendly-plan/
https://www.paulthomasmd.com/freedomtochoose.html
https://www.npr.org/sections/coronavirus-live-updates/2020/12/02/941022673/u-k-approves-pfizer-coronavirus-vaccine-for-emergency-use?utm_term=nprnews&utm_source=facebook.com&utm_campaign=npr&utm_medium=social
https://www.cbsnews.com/news/eeoc-covid-19-vaccine-employers-exclude-unvaccinated-workers/
https://journalofethics.ama-assn.org/article/mandatory-vaccination-legal-time-epidemic/2006-04
https://www.theatlantic.com/health/archive/2020/12/what-expect-when-you-get-covid-19-vaccine/617428/?utm_campaign=the-atlantic&utm_medium=social&utm_source=facebook
https://www.army.mil/article/241845/rollout_of_covid_19_vaccine_distribution_is_off_to_successful_start_officials_say
https://www.dakotanewsnow.com/2020/12/19/can-employers-require-the-covid-19-vaccine/
As of 5:30 pm on Dec. 18, 215,362 people in the US had been given a COVID vaccine.
5,052 of them had a "severe" reaction. (Unable to work/function, required care from a hospital.)
That is a severe reaction rate of 2.3%.
We are only seeing the very, very tip of the iceberg here. These are only the immediate reactions, it's too soon for long term. And theoretically they're vaccinating healthy people first.
What happens when they vaccinate the elderly or the not-so-healthy? What happens weeks or months down the road?
If you get this vaccine, YOU ARE THE EXPERIMENT. Remember that.
If you're time poor and can't watch this in it's entirety, start at approx 30 mins...
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=cTtIPBPSv0U
Found the manufacturer insert for the Pfizer c-19 jab if any is interested:
http://labeling.pfizer.com/ShowLabeling.aspx?id=14471
https://www.bbc.com/news/health-55244122
https://trib.al/vKWhOnE
https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2020/12/03/opinion/covid-19-vaccine-timeline.html
This is also some good info to go though when you have the time-
https://www.fda.gov/media/144245/download?fbclid=IwAR1uf-Q93JBd_s_0fL4-E2853vewRGSCYVspKpI7lKyMJ_MMqB-G_jWfKZM
Jay Walker, CEO of Apiject, is coming out with some truth about the #RFID chips placed inside the vaccine itself.
He said is only like a manufacturing serial number, and it's optional, but I said that's a load of BS because is still has the potential to track you and #WHO knows what else.
Also BE AWARE of the #RNA technology in the Covid Vaccines, as #GatesOfHell himself admitted: https://youtu.be/Eb2zRCCVhyY
Watch and decide for yourselves.
"Moderna volunteer sounds alarm on twitter about severe side effects and low "effectiveness" standards. He seems far more knowledgeable than most study subjects I would guess, worth hearing his experience (he is very in favor of this vaccine and worries it will be derailed because people won't be warned about how sick it would make them):
"Adverse reactions are common after the second shot of both these #RNA vaccines. I personally experienced an adverse reaction at least 50x worse with the Moderna vaccine than any other vaccine I have received, and I have received almost every vaccine."
"The population to be initially vaccinated will be front-line workers, and those most at risk of severe COVID symptoms or death (those with diabetes, heart conditions, the elderly, etc.). I am very concerned about severe adverse reactions in the latter group."
"It's up to vaccine companies as far as what they define to be a Grade 3 vs. Grade 4 adverse reaction. The grades are defined by the FDA; however, the questionnaires asked of participants have to be properly written, and staff trained, to align responses with FDA intent."
"There are other confounding factors in grade level assessment. My adverse reaction was so bad that I sat by my phone all night ready to dial 911 if I felt I would lose consciousness. I didn't call, because it would cost hundreds of dollars out of pocket for the ambulance and therefore, I couldn't positively answer the question the next morning, "Did you seek medical attention for any medical symptoms in the last 24 hours" (which is a contributing criterion for Grade 4). This is an example of how a badly-written question leads to bad data."
"Even if (conservatively speaking) the adverse reaction incidence rate is "only" say 10% (in keeping with the below Science editorial), then for the expected 40 million people to be vaccinated by the end of January, that's 4 million adverse reactions."
"Four million adverse reactions *will* be a media fiasco. People will tell their stories. Anti-vaxxers will be ecstatic. This is why I decided to speak up as a whistleblower in the CNBC story. RNA vaccines, though extremely easy to develop, may present significant challenges."
"It is extremely important to give people time to adjust to the idea that upon receiving the second shot, there's a significant possibility that they're going to have one of the worst nights of their life -- but that it might be worth it, because COVID can be much worse."
"As a data scientist, I can tell you that in the case of the Moderna vaccine, the followup questions that are asked of participants by a tracking app, for at least 8 days after each shot, are extremely badly written. Consequently, their data is bad (mostly incomplete)."
"comparing the Moderna and Pfizer adverse reaction prevalence to that of Shingrex is hardly a high bar, given that Shingrex is notorious for triggering adverse reactions that can last 2 years or more."
"My guess: most SARS-CoV-2 vaccines will last 3-6 months, depending on the type of vaccine, before a booster is needed. But we don't know how bad the interferon response will be for the 3rd or 4th or shot. If the Moderna trial required a 3rd shot, I would have dropped out!"
"The primary caveats are not being clearly explained by #Pfizer / #Moderna or the media. These vaccines were ~95% effective *for a small sample*, and, more importantly, only *at 2-4 months post-vaccination* And then there is this comment from another user."
"All they want to show is it's 95%, nothing else. Just like last Monday, just show the 90%, but didn't tell the whole story that it was 90% at 7 days after the second dose. Big Pharma and their money buying power!" "
So, what is RNA, first of all?
RNA serves as messenger system. It is a molecule that allows our genome, contained in all the DNA inside our nucleus, to be converted into functional components.
If the DNA is the encyclopedia for a living organism, RNA is a page of notes jotted down from one volume of the giant DNA encyclopedia. It’s not the same as the original, but instead is a similar but simplified and more user-friendly format.
Those RNA notes are then read by a specialized complex called a ribosome and a protein is synthesized as a result. The end product, the protein, is the functional component of a gene.
RNA itself only exists for a brief period of time, only as long as it is needed to be used as the template for the protein. Then it disintegrates.
In the case of the COVID-19 vaccines, there isn’t any DNA involved. We already know which RNA notes are the template for the viral proteins, so that step is completely bypassed.
The RNA in the vaccine will never interact with our DNA, and certainly won’t change our DNA. They aren’t the same molecules so they can’t interact with each other! In fact, RNA stays in a completely different compartment of our cells than DNA does.
So, the RNA in the vaccine will get into our bodies encased in a little fatty coating (because RNA is not stable and doesn’t exist for long), our cells will read the template and make the viral protein, which our immune system will recognize and mount a memory immune response to. That’s it! No DNA involved at all.
Animation showing how the mRNA vaccine against Covid-19 works.
The new vaccine, BNT162b2, has been developed by Pfizer/BioNTech. It uses a strand of messenger RNA genetic material (blue) based on that in the SARS-CoV-2 virus that causes Covid-19.
This is injected into the body encased in lipid nanoparticles, which allow it to be taken up by the body's cells. The mRNA is read by the cells, causing them to produce a mutated version of the viral spike protein (pink).
The mutation has been designed to stimulate an immune response, causing the body to produce antibodies (purple) against the spike protein. This means that the body is primed to attack the virus should it be encountered after vaccination, preventing disease.
The vaccine was approved in the UK on 2nd December 2020.
Take a look at our other coronavirus imagery: https://bit.ly/2wZa2Mb
Just a heads up - I have been sent Covid #Vaccine concerns - of note - all I have been sent are AstraZeneca vaccine - the two new coming out are Pfizer and Moderna - check for the same ingredients of concern in these vaccines and decide for yourself - thanks to you all 😎
#RNA #ChAD0x1 researchsquare.com
#recombinantDNA and #MRC-5 (aborted 14wk old male Caucasian fetus lung material that is replicated over and over)
#INPIC: The Central Drugs Standard Control Organisation on Wednesday permitted Pune-based #Gennova Biopharmaceuticals to conduct Phase 1/2 #clinicaltrials, along with animal toxicity data, for its mRNA Covid-19 vaccine candidate.
It is India's first messenger #RNA (mRNA) Covid vaccine candidate. Globally, US-based #pharmagiant Pfizer Inc has developed its mRNA vaccine.
Read more 👉👉 https://bit.ly/340Me85
https://www.news-medical.net/news/20201011/Rapid-and-sensitive-detection-of-SARS-CoV-2-with-functionalized-magnetic-nanoparticles.aspx
https://twitter.com/BusyDrT/status/1335020831504785417?s=20
https://www.sciencenews.org/article/coronavirus-covid-19-why-vaccines-cold-freeze-pfizer-moderna
https://www.latimes.com/science/story/2020-12-15/how-the-covid-19-vaccines-from-moderna-and-pfizer-compare-head-to-head
Looking for safety data on #Covid19vaccines?
This is from #Moderna.
Out of 193 potential participants, only 85 were deemed acceptable.
To be accepted you cannot have ANY medical conditions, must have perfect BMI, perfect blood pressure measurements, you cannot be on any type of medication even over-the-counter, and you MUST agree to "adhere to Lifestyle Conditions throughout study duration." Over 50% of the people who applied, were rejected.
https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/record/NCT04283461
•45 participants were between the ages of 18 and 55.
•20 participants were between the ages of 56 and 70.
•20 participants were of the age of 71 or older.
Here are the results of the perfectly healthy 85 people they chose:
Ages 18-55: 71% OF PARTICIPANTS HAD AN ADVERSE REACTION
Ages 56-70: 50% OF PARTICIPANTS HAD AN ADVERSE REACTION
Ages 71+: 70% OF PARTICIPANTS HAD AN ADVERSE REACTION
https://www.icandecide.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/11/Moderna-Combined-Production.pdf
And who knows what types of long-term issues this may cause these people, too.
https://oye.news/news/health/vaccines/the-truth-about-the-moderna-pfizer-covid-19-vaccine-effectiveness-claims/
"Moderna volunteer sounds alarm on twitter about severe side effects and low "effectiveness" standards. He seems far more knowledgeable than most study subjects I would guess, worth hearing his experience (he is very in favor of this vaccine and worries it will be derailed because people won't be warned about how sick it would make them):
"Adverse reactions are common after the second shot of both these #RNA vaccines. I personally experienced an adverse reaction at least 50x worse with the Moderna vaccine than any other vaccine I have received, and I have received almost every vaccine."
"The population to be initially vaccinated will be front-line workers, and those most at risk of severe COVID symptoms or death (those with diabetes, heart conditions, the elderly, etc.). I am very concerned about severe adverse reactions in the latter group."
"It's up to vaccine companies as far as what they define to be a Grade 3 vs. Grade 4 adverse reaction. The grades are defined by the FDA; however, the questionnaires asked of participants have to be properly written, and staff trained, to align responses with FDA intent."
"There are other confounding factors in grade level assessment. My adverse reaction was so bad that I sat by my phone all night ready to dial 911 if I felt I would lose consciousness. I didn't call, because it would cost hundreds of dollars out of pocket for the ambulance and therefore, I couldn't positively answer the question the next morning, "Did you seek medical attention for any medical symptoms in the last 24 hours" (which is a contributing criterion for Grade 4). This is an example of how a badly-written question leads to bad data."
"Even if (conservatively speaking) the adverse reaction incidence rate is "only" say 10% (in keeping with the below Science editorial), then for the expected 40 million people to be vaccinated by the end of January, that's 4 million adverse reactions."
"Four million adverse reactions *will* be a media fiasco. People will tell their stories. Anti-vaxxers will be ecstatic. This is why I decided to speak up as a whistleblower in the CNBC story. RNA vaccines, though extremely easy to develop, may present significant challenges."
"It is extremely important to give people time to adjust to the idea that upon receiving the second shot, there's a significant possibility that they're going to have one of the worst nights of their life -- but that it might be worth it, because COVID can be much worse."
"As a data scientist, I can tell you that in the case of the Moderna vaccine, the followup questions that are asked of participants by a tracking app, for at least 8 days after each shot, are extremely badly written. Consequently, their data is bad (mostly incomplete)."
"comparing the Moderna and Pfizer adverse reaction prevalence to that of Shingrex is hardly a high bar, given that Shingrex is notorious for triggering adverse reactions that can last 2 years or more."
"My guess: most SARS-CoV-2 vaccines will last 3-6 months, depending on the type of vaccine, before a booster is needed. But we don't know how bad the interferon response will be for the 3rd or 4th or shot. If the Moderna trial required a 3rd shot, I would have dropped out!"
"The primary caveats are not being clearly explained by #Pfizer / #Moderna or the media. These vaccines were ~95% effective *for a small sample*, and, more importantly, only *at 2-4 months post-vaccination* And then there is this comment from another user."
"All they want to show is it's 95%, nothing else. Just like last Monday, just show the 90%, but didn't tell the whole story that it was 90% at 7 days after the second dose. Big Pharma and their money buying power!" "
https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMoa2034577
https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S1471491420302124
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/health-54902908?at_custom2=facebook_page&at_custom1=%5Bpost+type%5D&at_medium=custom7&at_custom4=C7755A78-2803-11EB-A053-63113A982C1E&at_campaign=64&at_custom3=BBC+News
https://bit.ly/3liiY3s
https://beta.regulations.gov/comment/CDC-2020-0081-0001
https://www.biznews.com/thought-leaders/2020/12/19/covid-19-vaccines-wsj?fbclid=IwAR3TIgbieToKPfx0oefEmhUtdc4jHQ-vzuCv_kzndvu84obcYb78d7IQ7Y8
https://www.fox32chicago.com/news/alaska-health-care-worker-suffers-adverse-reaction-after-covid-19-vaccine?utm_campaign=trueanthem&utm_medium=trueanthem&utm_source=facebook&fbclid=IwAR2uozf5qUqLx0nTkn-fnrw8qiVmGbxMXDKd5CDMzbPjGKZwAks-oW4dgDY
2nd Health Care Worker
https://www.pix11.com/news/national/coronavirus/second-alaska-health-care-worker-has-severe-reaction-to-covid-19-vaccine?fbclid=IwAR3RCDTVMXQ56YUtRLGEM5tKf7GBrSO-4K_xESjeWEMj6trp_g0u8TsB7ek
https://www.nbcnews.com/news/education/covid-having-devastating-impact-children-vaccine-won-t-fix-everything-n1251172?cid=sm_npd_nn_fb_nn&fbclid=IwAR12rc1hCZbRHpdDc7I6BLpXlmKCgOX95K8b-JbG0ygRwIF8QL01Gkcs22g
https://uk.reuters.com/article/uk-factcheck-covid-19-vaccine-modify/false-claim-a-covid-19-vaccine-will-genetically-modify-humans-idUSKBN22U2BZ
https://www.history.com/news/swine-flu-rush-vaccine-election-year-1976
The Moderna COVID-19 Vaccine contains the following ingredients: messenger ribonucleic acid (mRNA), lipids (SM-102, polyethylene glycol [PEG] 2000 dimyristoyl glycerol [DMG], cholesterol, and 1,2-distearoyl-sn-glycero-3-phosphocholine [DSPC]), tromethamine, tromethamine hydrochloride, acetic acid, sodium acetate, and sucrose
https://30g7el1b4b1n28kgpr414nuu-wpengine.netdna-ssl.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/12/Pfizer-BioNTech-COVID-19-Vaccine-EUA-Fact-Sheet-for-HCP_0.pdf
https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04283461
https://www.health.nd.gov/sites/www/files/documents/COVID%20Vaccine%20Page/COVID-19%20Vaccine%20Fetal%20Cell%20Handout.pdf
https://www.sciencemag.org/news/2020/06/abortion-opponents-protest-covid-19-vaccines-use-fetal-cells
🙄https://kfoxtv.com/news/nation-world/vatican-ok-to-get-virus-vaccines-using-abortion-cell-lines
https://lozierinstitute.org/what-you-need-to-know-about-the-covid-19-vaccine/
https://www.cvdvaccine-us.com/images/pdf/fact-sheet-for-hcp-administering-vaccine-vaccination-providers-full-eua-prescribing-information.pdf?fbclid=IwAR2iAU0EVHT1OQwY8E_an-5LKZLy4r07JWfacfTki3JQA0dgtzXQ7ErW0wA
https://www.immunize.org/fda/
https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.technologyreview.com/2020/12/09/1013538/what-are-the-ingredients-of-pfizers-covid-19-vaccine/amp/
https://www.health.nd.gov/sites/www/files/documents/COVID%20Vaccine%20Page/COVID-19%20Vaccine%20Fetal%20Cell%20Handout.pdf
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6027112/
https://vaccine.guide/
https://www.livingwhole.org/god-does-not-support-vaccines/
Learntherisk.org
https://knowbetterdobetter.blog/
Aborted fetal cells
Here is a list....
☀RA273
Taken from the lung of a 3 month gestation aborted baby. R=Rubella, A=Abortus, 27=27th baby, 3=3rd tissue explant. (Then cultivated on the WI-38 aborted fetal cell line to get the MMR viruses. Stanley Plotkin, vaccine developer, would later reveal that 40 more babies were aborted after RA273 was successfully isolated, with virus strains taken from 34 of them. A total of over 80 separate abortions were involved in the research and final production of the present day rubella vaccine- 21 abortions from the original WI-1 through WI-26 fetal cell lines that failed, plus WI-38 itself, plus 67 from the attempts to isolate the rubella virus.)
☀MERC-5: Developed in 1970 from the lung tissue of a 14 week gestation male baby. Introduced in Great Britain by the Medical Research Council.
☀HEK-293: Developed in 1973 from aborted baby kidney cells genetically engineered combined with adenovirus. 293 is the number of the experiment.
☀Per C6
Developed in 2001 from an isolated retina of a baby about 18 weeks gestation. This cell line was made to be ‘immortal’ but failed. It caused cancerous tumors in mice. Was used in the HIV vaccine trial but caused cancer so it was pulled. Crucell-advent of their PER C6 fetal cell line took off. PER C6 is a normal cell that has been modified to resist cell senescence. In doing so, it introduces the potential for cancer to form in the vaccine recipient.
☀WI-26 VA4
An SV40 transformed derivative of WI-26, a human diploid cell line derived from embryonic lung tissue of a male Caucasian. The cells have SV40 T-Ag but infectious virus has not been rescued.
☀WALVAX2
Recently developed from the lung tissue of a 3 month gestation baby girl. To replace the current MERC-5 and WI-38 which are depleting.
To obtain all these, the scientists had to be present at the time of the abortion because "In order to sustain 96% of the cells, the live tissue would need to be preserved within 5 minutes of the abortion"-Dr. C. Ward Kischer.
And it's still happening today. Notice again the last listed: WALVAX2. This is a brand new line in which 9 babies died in the making and the baby ultimately used was intentionally delivered alive in the sac for best harvesting. This is going to be the New MMR.
http://www.lifenews.com/2015/09/09/scientists-in-china-create-new-vaccines-using-body-parts-from-nine-aborted-babies/
And it will admittedly continue. PBS recently reports on how fetal tissue is VITAL to vaccine and drug development:
http://www.pbs.org/newshour/rundown/medical-researchers-say-fetal-tissue-remains-essential/
There are 271 vaccines (and 85 drugs) in the pipeline awaiting approvals that we cannot see the ingredients too yet but you can bet they include fetal lines just like our current ones do:
http://phrma.org/medicines-in-development-for-vaccines-2013
http://soundchoice.org/aborted-fetal-products/
WALVAX 2 is taken from the lung tissue of a 3 month gestation female who was ultimately selected from among 9 aborted BABIES. The scientists noted how they followed specific guidelines to mimic WI-38 and MRC-5 in selecting the aborted babies, ranging from 2-4 months gestation. They further noted how they induced labor using a “water bag” abortion to shorten the delivery time and PREVENT THE DEATH OF THE FETUS to ensure LIVE intact organs which were immediately sent to the labs for cell preparation.
Keep telling yourself that this is ok..."for the greater good". This can be done without murdering babies. It's done all the time without murdering babies....Just not when the cdc can profit from it in the U.S. This practice is disgusting. Did you know that fragmented fetal DNA has been proven to combine with vaccine recipient DNA permanently altering that child's DNA? Did you know that the study to prove this and show the link between this fractional DNA and childhood Leukemia is currently underway? Its actually proven, but in order to get a peer reviewed study to the public is not so easy. Very rich people will lose a lot of money. That's what happens when you let the cdc OWN vaccine patents, make profits from vaccines, and then also police themselves.
And please heavily consider the part that explains that these new vaccine cell lines are being made in China...they currently ship us fish farmed in feces, toys with high lead content, and plastic rice...Do you really think they are concerned about your family's safety?
Not only that but did you know....
They found intact human male DNA-- not even in fragments. The whole genome was found in the MMR-V. This was confirmed to be the DNA of the aborted male child called "MRC-5" that is listed as a vaccine ingredient.
Click: https://www.corvelva.it/en/speciale-corvelva/vaccinegate-en/what-did-we-find-in-the-mmrv-priorix-tetra-vaccine.html
https://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/pubs/pinkbook/downloads/appendices/b/excipient-table-2.pdf
Praying for you! This is a note I wrote 6 months into my vaccine research journey..
• Vaccines and soul ties
Have you seen a child having a seizure after a vaccine?
Example here:
https://www.facebook.com/sas.bullock1/posts/1232407800119330
Demonic possession was my first thought when I saw the footage but thought I was being totally crazy and going off the edge.
But as I read more and more about vaccines, the more plausible it seems that there could be a spiritual component.
1. Memories in DNA could be passed down generations. (This is "scientific"....and the passing reminds me of generations curses / blessings.)
2. When a couple has physical relations, DNA is passed and retained. (Also "scientific".)
3. In Christian circles, physical intimacy is said to result in "soul ties".
4. Could DNA = "soul ties", "spiritual issues"??
5. Listen to how human DNA is extracted for the development and making of vaccines: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dlqFQLLOTEU&feature=youtu.be
"What if we could remove aborted baby cells from vaccinations? Would that then make it safe to inject human beings with animal cells from pig blood, rabbit brains, dog kidneys, cow hearts or toxins such as aluminum, mercury and formaldehyde...etc into ourselves or others?
Is there a reason why God mentioned the importance of keeping our blood pure so many times in the Bible?
Could injecting human beings with DNA from other humans and animals actually be opening up doors for physical, mental, emotional and spiritual torment?"
http://www.whollyalignment.com/vaccines.html"
https://www.newsmax.com/t/newsmax/article/1002579?section=newsfront&keywords=virus-outbreak-vatican-vaccine&year=2020&month=12&date=21&id=1002579&oref=m.facebook.com
Children of God for life has a lot of information on all vaccines that use aborted fetal cell lines. https://cogforlife.org/wp-content/uploads/CovidCompareMoralImmoral.pdf?fbclid=IwAR0DcsHblQ5OGWBAuKI5qtv_yE2lreNSaG-Y5QXuQYq3_xEiKS3vPL8ssG0
Some are wondering if the new mRNA COVID v@ ccines by Pfizer & Moderna, like other v@ ccines, contain aborted human fetal cells. I do not conclusively know the answer, as the complete list of ingredients has not yet been released to my knowledge, but according to Dr. Daniel Hinthorn, who was interviewed by Focus on the Family (12/18) and testified about the approved COVID v@ ccines by Pfizer & Moderna, “…they are not created from fetal cell lines; however, often these kinds of v@ ccines are checked in fetal cell lines just to see if they work…” If it’s true that aborted fetal cells were used for that part, then I don’t understand how checking the efficacy of these v@ ccines is not considered part of the process of providing vaccines for the public. The process, from the very beginning to the injecting of the v@ ccine into the skin of the recipient, includes safety testing; so if aborted fetal cell lines were used for safety testing, then aborted babies were indeed involved in the COVID v@ ccine, even IF cells are not among the ingredients.
This leads to another question: should it matter? I’m not going to give an answer (it’s not for me to decide for you) but hopefully this will help you think through some things you may have not yet considered. When I first learned that v@ ccines are made with aborted human DNA, I dismissed it until I gave it more thought and discovered I had several misconceptions. Perhaps you are a pro-lifer who gets v@ ccines - can you relate with believing any of the rationalizations below? Would you be willing to at least read those?
“BUT THE V@ CCINE INDUSTRY DIDN’T COERCE OR PERFORM THE ABORTIONS, SO THEY’RE TAKING SOMETHING BAD AND TURNING IT INTO SOMETHING GOOD, EVEN NOBLE, RIGHT?”
I am under the conviction that the use of DNA from aborted human babies serves to condone, justify, and incentivize abortions. We’re not talking about good coming from accidental deaths that couldn’t be prevented; these aborted deaths are voluntary. We’re talking about scientists who need deaths of healthy babies, ones of a particular gestational age, who are delivered in special ways, whose parts are dissected and preserved in distinct ways. The one who performs the abortion, as well as the other staff, has a conflict of interest interfering with their influence over the mother’s decision to abort. On top of the profit from the procedure itself, they are paid to use specific techniques to kill and remove the child in a manner that will not damage the organs and tissues needed for the v@ ccine study and preserve it accordingly. For the WALVAX-2 “ingredient” (a.k.a. aborted human DNA), “they induced labor using a ‘water bag’ abortion to shorten the delivery time and prevent the death of the fetus to ensure live intact organs which were immediately sent to the labs for cell preparation.” (Source: Go to the LifeNews website and search: Scientists in China Create New Va@ ccines Using Body Parts From Nine Aborted Babies, 9/9/15) Additionally, according to Dr. C. Ward Kischer, the scientist must also be present during the abortion because, "in order to sustain 96% of the cells, the live tissue would need to be preserved within 5 minutes of the abortion."
THE ARGUMENT: “BUT IT’S JUST A FEW.”
No. Dr. Stanley Plotkin, v@ ccine developer and “pioneer,” testified in this deposition that in just ONE report he used 76 aborted fetuses (summed up at 2 minutes, 32 seconds) (search YouTube for “Stanley Plotkin - abortion’s for v@ ccines - 2018 deposition” on 11/12/18 (but correctly spell v@ ccines).
On v@ ccine ingredients lists, each letter-number code represents which number baby DNA was chosen after studying all of the options. For instance, v@ ccine ingredient RA273 represents: Rubella (R), Abortus (A), the 27th baby: the lung of a 3 month gestation aborted baby (27), 3rd tissue explants (3). WALVAX-2 was the 2nd of 9 babies aborted for that study. Cells, cellular debris, protein, and DNA from aborted babies are identified as RA273, WALVAX2, PER C6, HEK293, IMR-90, IMR-91, WI 1-26, WI-38, WI-44, MCR-5, HEK-293, and Lambda.hE1, are found in more than 23 different v@ ccines.
“IT’S A FORM OF ORGAN-DONATION AND THAT IS AN INDISPUTABLY GOOD THING. HOW IS THIS ANY DIFFERENT?”
It is not comparable to organ-donation because it is not a voluntary choice on the part of the donor (i.e. baby). In organ-donation: 1) the death of the organ-donor is unable to be prevented, and 2) the donation is a voluntary choice on the part of the donor. Neither is true when it comes to the abortion of healthy babies selected for v@ ccine studies/production. The moral dilemma: is it ethical and does it honor God to take a stand against abortion while simultaneously a) supporting an industry that profits from it and b) willingly using the products (i.e. v@ ccines) made from it?
“BUT LIKE ORGAN-DONATION AND BLOOD INFUSIONS, DNA FROM ABORTED HUMAN BABIES SAVES LIVES, RIGHT?”
V@ ccine package inserts state that they have notbeen tested for carcinogenic, mutagenic, or fertility impairing properties. Pause. That can take a minute to sink in. Not tested for carcinogenic, mutagenic, or fertility impairing properties. The MRC-5 human diploid cell line, for example, is from human DNA aborted in the 1960s. It is an “immortalized” cell line (a.k.a. continuous or abnormal cell) with insertions, deletions, and translocations (i.e. rewritten DNA) and is considered oncogenic (i.e. cancer), containing insertional mutagenesis following DNA integration. Unlike human conception, which is a combination of genes from 2 sources to make a new whole, insertional mutagenesis is a corruption from foreign material. (*I can share a link.)
[*Human fetal DNA integration leads to mutagenesis and is carcinogenic. Another common v@ ccine ingredient, formaldehyde, is also a carcinogen and mutagen. The herbicide, glyphosate (a.k.a. Round Up, by Monsanto), is also a carcinogen that is found to have contaminated multiple v@ ccine ingredients (I can share the pdf). Many v@ ccine side effects include symptoms that are identical to heavy metal poisoning. Trace amounts of heavy metals contained in v@ ccines add up to be significant amounts when administered in multiple v@ ccines given on the same day, or in the same 6 month time period, or 12 month time period, and it overwhelms the body and the immune system. (Our pediatrician highly recommends the documentary, Trace Amounts.) The heavy metals cross the blood-brain barrier and enter the brain and tissues more easily when giving Tylenol, which is commonly recommended for the low grade fever and soreness of the injection site. Allergies have become prevalent in our society and v@ ccine ingredients include allergens like egg proteins, gelatin, baker’s yeast, and latex. V@ ccines contain antigens (virus/disease) grown on human and animal DNA, and adjuvants (added ingredients), and they combine to form a dangerous cocktail (or dare I say potion?). The end of Revelation 18:23 says, “…and all nations were deceived by your sorcery.” (“Sorcery” from the Greek word ‘pharmakeia’ means: the use or administering of drugs; poisoning; or sorcery/magical arts.) And John wrote Revelation to warn us of what we are to expect before the return of Jesus Christ. This will happen – if not now, then in the future, and it is wise to be on guard against it.]
“WHAT’S DONE IS DONE. WE CAN ONLY MOVE FORWARD BECAUSE WE’RE NOT SAFE WITHOUT V@ CCINES, RIGHT?”
Studies on carcinogenic, mutagenic, and fertility-impairing properties are not the only studies that are lacking. Safety studies on pregnant recipients are lacking. Studies on long-term safety are lacking. Safety studies on combinations of v@ ccines (multiple injections) administered in a single appointment are lacking. Safety studies on the compounding effects of all of the v@ ccines in the CDC schedule administered at the recommended ages are lacking. Scientific studies with double-blind, inert placebos are lacking. Third-party experimentation with no conflict of interest is lacking. What’s worse is that accountability for v@ ccine safety is lacking: The 1986 National Childhood V@ ccine Injury Act (NCVIA) prevented the v@ ccine industry from being sued directly by the public for v@ ccine injury. So the National V@ ccine Injury Compensation Program (VICP) was set up as a federal "no-fault" system which, since 1988, has paid out over 4 billion dollars in v@ ccine injury compensation. This “no-fault” system had one condition, established by the Mandate for Safer Childhood V@ ccine clause in December 1987: it legally required the Department of Health and Human Services to submit to Congress biennial reports which are to include detailed Improvements in v@ ccine safety. No such reports have ever been submitted – not once in 30+ years (I can share the link.)
PROS OUTWEIGH THE CONS? SACRIFICE “FEW” FOR THE MASSES?
It is my conviction that sacrificing a human life via abortion IS able to be justified (forgiven) by the blood of Jesus but is unable to be justified (made honorable) by good motives, even if it’s in attempt to promote health for the masses. (I say “attempt” because the evidence convinces me v@ ccines do not promote health but actually damage the immune system of the masses, even if the symptoms don’t appear until later and appear in the form of allergies, autoimmune disease, infertility, cancer, Alzheimer’s, etc.)
I WAS PRO-V@ CCINES. I have lots of doctors, nurses, and other medical professionals in my family and was raised with a western medicine approach to health. I was the last person to want to consider that my doctor, a firm believer in Jesus, might not know the ins and outs about v@ ccines. I have two immuno-compromised children and was the last person on earth who wanted to consider that the immunologist’s advice might not be right. I have no medical training and am the last person who wanted the weighty responsibility of managing the health of my children. It took me OVER A DECADE to sift through enough PubMed abstracts, other scientific studies, CDC adverse reaction and contraindication info, v@ ccine manufacturer ingredients lists, VAERS v@ ccine reactions database, and hear testimonies from enough medical professionals who turned from being advocates for v@ ccines to advocates for v@ ccine safety, etc. before my perspective did a full 180. But don’t take my word for it. My intention is not to enter into any kind of debate – I know that no matter a person’s stance on v@ ccines, we all share the sincere goal of promoting the best possible health for our loved ones. I do hope, though, that all will investigate the matter and seek to be informed before consenting. The news articles and videos on the Physicians for Informed Consent website is a good place to start. Beware of censored search engines (I can share with you websites or uncensored search engine options). May God bless us and lead us in these difficult decisions. I pray for peace, health, and safety for all.
https://cogforlife.org/2020/03/25/much-hyped-moderna-mrna-1273-covid-19-vaccine-uses-aborted-fetal-cells-sanofi-pasteurs-version-does-not/
https://lozierinstitute.org/what-you-need-to-know-about-the-covid-19-vaccine/
https://lozierinstitute.org/update-covid-19-vaccine-candidates-and-abortion-derived-cell-lines/
Aborted fetal cells
Here is a list....
☀RA273
Taken from the lung of a 3 month gestation aborted baby. R=Rubella, A=Abortus, 27=27th baby, 3=3rd tissue explant. (Then cultivated on the WI-38 aborted fetal cell line to get the MMR viruses. Stanley Plotkin, vaccine developer, would later reveal that 40 more babies were aborted after RA273 was successfully isolated, with virus strains taken from 34 of them. A total of over 80 separate abortions were involved in the research and final production of the present day rubella vaccine- 21 abortions from the original WI-1 through WI-26 fetal cell lines that failed, plus WI-38 itself, plus 67 from the attempts to isolate the rubella virus.)
☀MERC-5: Developed in 1970 from the lung tissue of a 14 week gestation male baby. Introduced in Great Britain by the Medical Research Council.
☀HEK-293: Developed in 1973 from aborted baby kidney cells genetically engineered combined with adenovirus. 293 is the number of the experiment.
☀Per C6
Developed in 2001 from an isolated retina of a baby about 18 weeks gestation. This cell line was made to be ‘immortal’ but failed. It caused cancerous tumors in mice. Was used in the HIV vaccine trial but caused cancer so it was pulled. Crucell-advent of their PER C6 fetal cell line took off. PER C6 is a normal cell that has been modified to resist cell senescence. In doing so, it introduces the potential for cancer to form in the vaccine recipient.
☀WI-26 VA4
An SV40 transformed derivative of WI-26, a human diploid cell line derived from embryonic lung tissue of a male Caucasian. The cells have SV40 T-Ag but infectious virus has not been rescued.
☀WALVAX2
Recently developed from the lung tissue of a 3 month gestation baby girl. To replace the current MERC-5 and WI-38 which are depleting.
To obtain all these, the scientists had to be present at the time of the abortion because "In order to sustain 96% of the cells, the live tissue would need to be preserved within 5 minutes of the abortion"-Dr. C. Ward Kischer.
And it's still happening today. Notice again the last listed: WALVAX2. This is a brand new line in which 9 babies died in the making and the baby ultimately used was intentionally delivered alive in the sac for best harvesting. This is going to be the New MMR.
http://www.lifenews.com/2015/09/09/scientists-in-china-create-new-vaccines-using-body-parts-from-nine-aborted-babies/
And it will admittedly continue. PBS recently reports on how fetal tissue is VITAL to vaccine and drug development:
http://www.pbs.org/newshour/rundown/medical-researchers-say-fetal-tissue-remains-essential/
There are 271 vaccines (and 85 drugs) in the pipeline awaiting approvals that we cannot see the ingredients too yet but you can bet they include fetal lines just like our current ones do:
http://phrma.org/medicines-in-development-for-vaccines-2013
http://soundchoice.org/aborted-fetal-products/
WALVAX 2 is taken from the lung tissue of a 3 month gestation female who was ultimately selected from among 9 aborted BABIES. The scientists noted how they followed specific guidelines to mimic WI-38 and MRC-5 in selecting the aborted babies, ranging from 2-4 months gestation. They further noted how they induced labor using a “water bag” abortion to shorten the delivery time and PREVENT THE DEATH OF THE FETUS to ensure LIVE intact organs which were immediately sent to the labs for cell preparation.
Keep telling yourself that this is ok..."for the greater good". This can be done without murdering babies. It's done all the time without murdering babies....Just not when the cdc can profit from it in the U.S. This practice is disgusting. Did you know that fragmented fetal DNA has been proven to combine with vaccine recipient DNA permanently altering that child's DNA? Did you know that the study to prove this and show the link between this fractional DNA and childhood Leukemia is currently underway? Its actually proven, but in order to get a peer reviewed study to the public is not so easy. Very rich people will lose a lot of money. That's what happens when you let the cdc OWN vaccine patents, make profits from vaccines, and then also police themselves.
And please heavily consider the part that explains that these new vaccine cell lines are being made in China...they currently ship us fish farmed in feces, toys with high lead content, and plastic rice...Do you really think they are concerned about your family's safety?
Not only that but did you know....
They found intact human male DNA-- not even in fragments. The whole genome was found in the MMR-V. This was confirmed to be the DNA of the aborted male child called "MRC-5" that is listed as a vaccine ingredient.
Click: https://www.corvelva.it/en/speciale-corvelva/vaccinegate-en/what-did-we-find-in-the-mmrv-priorix-tetra-vaccine.html
https://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/pubs/pinkbook/downloads/appendices/b/excipient-table-2.pdf
https://youtu.be/YpRAbfhIhlo
The use of aborted fetal cells in Covid vaccines:
https://cogforlife.org/wp-content/uploads/CovidCompareMoralImmoral.pdf
https://www.greenmedinfo.com/blog/pro-life-and-pro-vaccine-ultimate-hypocrisy
https://www.facebook.com/thewilddoctn/videos/225282309036772/
update:
https://www.sciencemag.org/news/2020/12/covid-19-10-times-deadlier-people-down-syndrome-raising-calls-early-vaccination
https://www.cvdvaccine-us.com/images/pdf/fact-sheet-for-hcp-administering-vaccine-vaccination-providers-full-eua-prescribing-information.pdf
https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/regulatory-approval-of-pfizer-biontech-vaccine-for-covid-19/information-for-healthcare-professionals-on-pfizerbiontech-covid-19-vaccine
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/health/article-9018547/Pfizer-CEO-not-certain-covid-shot-prevents-transmission.html
https://www.msn.com/en-us/health/medical/7-unanswered-questions-about-the-coronavirus-vaccines-from-pfizer-and-moderna/ar-BB1aQFgS
Insert:
https://www.fda.gov/media/144413/download
Keep informed: As per CDC website, as of Dec 18, -
of the 112,807 who received the COVID vax, 3150 are
“**unable to perform normal daily activities, unable to work, required care from doctor or health care professional”
Link: https://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/acip/meetings/downloads/slides-2020-12/slides-12-19/05-COVID-CLARK.pdf
That’s almost 3% 😳😡
https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMp2020926
My father Steve Kohn wrote this but I thought it would be appreciated here:
For those who are curious, here's where the "95%" effective vaccine number comes from. I'll explain this now. The vaccine is given in two doses. There were a little over 43,000 people in the trial, half of whom got the vaccine, half got the placebo. Within the first 7 days, 42% of more people caught COVID in the vaccine group compared with the placebo (page 42 of the report).
After the first shot, 1,588 vaccinated people got COVID, 1,654 placebo people got COVID. That's a 4% increase for the placebo group, which is statistically within anyone's margin of error.
The, for the second shot, they ELIMINATED the 3,242 people who already caught COVID during the trial from the math, and found that after the 2nd shot only 8 people from the vaccine group got COVID while 162 from the placebo group did.
THAT's where the 95% effective number comes from. BUT, overall, here's the score:
Vaccinated group: 1,594 cases
Placebo group: 1,816 cases
Is the vaccine effective? According to this data, yes, but....
13.9%....not 95%.
BUT, before you get excited about that, there are many more adverse reactions in the vaccine group than the placebo group.
Also, we don't know if the disease was prevented in the people who would otherwise die from it.
To me, the most interesting part of this report is that fact that almost 8% of people got COVID within 60 days. That's a gigantic number, but remember, this study tested EVERYONE regardless of symptoms. So, if 8% of the population got COVID in 60 days (440K people per day in the US) at a time when the US was reporting 50K cases per day (mostly October), then possibly 9 times the number of people reported have already caught it (with most not knowing so), which means that half of the country could already have already caught COVID. It also means that currently, where 250K cases are being reported daily, it could truly be over 2MM daily. The other thing it could mean is that the 3% death rate might actually be 1/3 of 1%.
In other words, it would appear that it's rapidly burning through the population right now and will wane over the course of the next year, vanishing completely. Pfizer will take the credit of course, but it's going to end all by itself anyway, and the vaccine might help 1/7 of the people who take it.
https://m.facebook.com/groups/VaccinationReEducationDiscussionForum/permalink/3913853412000811/
https://www.darksidevaccines.com/covid-19-vaccines-are-they-safe/
https://www.lifesitenews.com/news/pfizer-coronavirus-vaccine-not-safe-for-pregnant-or-breastfeeding-mums-potential-danger-for-fertility
a lawsuit to site when you deny the vax:
https://www.ini-world-report.org/2019/12/30/u-s-government-loses-landmark-lawsuit-over-forced-vaccinations/?fbclid=IwAR0opF9JoGs5J_QieANUfHSD2Ri5qJBbzXapr_2CBRUqgG4iAwS8ONYhz2A
https://www.thehealthyamerican.org/
https://m.facebook.com/story.php?story_fbid=10151470884014957&id=501599956
https://thehighwire.com/
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=KzpdaJgjh8c&feature=youtu.be
https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.nytimes.com/2020/12/18/us/eeoc-employers-coronavirus-mandate.amp.html
POSTING ANONYMOUSLY FOR A VALUED MEMBER
I know this is a super sore subject. Please ignore my ignorance. I am a COVID health care professional. Yesterday I received the vaccine. I thought if there’s anyone to get it, it should be me. I can be the experiment because if it could help further people then I’d be willing to deal with side effects. Well, they make you wait 15 minutes after receiving it. I passed the 15 minutes. 45 minutes later at work, I became extremely hot, sweaty, clammy, and tachycardic and confused and they called a condition and got me to the ER. What bothered me is how they pushed this off. They’re like oh it’s not the vaccine. It most certainly is. Don’t say it isn’t. And that’s FINE if it is but let me know how I can let the company know how to improve. So, if anyone works in healthcare.. or is thinking of getting it please discuss it first. I was in a life threatening situation. I won’t be getting it again simply for the fact at how it was handled. I shouldnt be shocked but here I am. Informed decisions. ✅ know your info. I was the 4th one to go down with the same symptoms at my hospital yesterday. Bad batch? I’m not sure.
Urgent warning from Dr Vernon Coleman on adverse health impacts from the Covid-19 vaccine, extract:
I have just seen a report from the Advisory Committee on Immunisation Practices Covid-19 Vaccine Work Group at the CDC.
This is a report on anaphylaxis following m-RNA Covid-19 vaccine receipt, and the report includes a table headed: 'V-Safe Active Surveillance for Covid-19 Vaccine'.
The table lists the number of registrants with a recorded first dose by December 18th as 112,807 and the number of Health Impact Events as 3,150.
Health Impact Events are defined as individuals, 'unable to perform normal daily activities, unable to work, required care from doctor or health professional'.
That is 2.79%, and it is within days of receiving the vaccine.
If 60 million people in the UK have the vaccine we can, therefore, expect 1.67 million people to be 'unable to work, perform normal daily activities and to require care from a doctor or health professional'.
And that is just the short-term effect of the vaccine. We obviously don’t know what will happen in the months and years ahead.
https://brandnewtube.com/watch/urgent-news-about-the-covid-19-vaccine_botqwzI8R7UUVY2.html
Exactly yes , to say nothing of the medium / long term consequences, millions of people will suffer from just the first dose!
heres the link to which he refers...
https://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/acip/meetings/downloads/slides-2020-12/slides-12-19/05-COVID-CLARK.pdf
https://www.bitchute.com/video/hZVs7lx1FWna/
Even Gavi acknowledges immunity from
Covid lasts : https://www.gavi.org/vaccineswork/natural-immunity-covid-19-may-be-long-lasting?fbclid=IwAR2ZfHW8_2SG1cGtJIWKuGpMFwRZkwCR692wr9qwNSxrU8qqrqL-ycSSQuI
https://www.facebook.com/WendyBellRadio/videos/1301356750220899/
https://www.facebook.com/425469784277406/posts/1719614054862966/
https://directorsblog.nih.gov/2020/07/28/immune-t-cells-may-offer-lasting-protection-against-covid-19/
Also this is a great video to watch. It’s an interview with Dr. Mike Yeadon who is the ex Vice President of Pfizer. It’s 32 minutes worth watching.
https://www.bitchute.com/video/p5hdVIhqu8HD/
https://medicalxpress.com/news/2020-10-sars-cov-antibodies-immunity.html
BUSTED🙌🙌🙌 straight from BMJ
But the truth is that the science remains far from clear cut, *even for influenza vaccines* that have been used for decades. Although randomized trials have shown an effect in reducing the risk of symptomatic influenza, *such trials have never been conducted in elderly people living in the community to see whether they save lives.*
Only two placebo controlled trials in this population have ever been conducted, and *neither was designed to detect any difference in hospital admissions or deaths.*23 *Moreover, dramatic *increases in use of influenza vaccines **has not been associated with a decline in mortality** (box 2).26
https://www.bmj.com/content/371/bmj.m4037
https://childrenshealthdefense.org/defender/pfizer-covid-vaccine-reaction-fda-peg/
https://www.bbc.com/news/amp/health-55244122
https://www.fda.gov/media/144245/download
https://www.sciencemag.org/news/2020/12/suspicions-grow-nanoparticles-pfizer-s-covid-19-vaccine-trigger-rare-allergic-reactions
Pfizer insert The Insert https://www.fda.gov/media/144413/download
Moderna report which includes what looks like the insert. Moderna FDA report https://www.fda.gov/media/144434/download
Pfizer Insert:
https://covid-vaccine.canada.ca/info/pdf/pfizer-biontech-covid-19-vaccine-pm1-en.pdf
Pfizer insert:
https://www.fda.gov/media/144413/download
Moderna insert:
https://www.fda.gov/media/144637/download
Sorry, my math isn't working today,
Evidence of Dangerous P@thogenic Priming
in older adults who receive the Covid v@ccine:
Pathogenic priming is when you take a v@ccine which "primes" or prepares you to mount an immune response later on when you are exposed to the invader (usually virus) again. Pathogenic priming means that when you see the invader again, you actually respond in a hyperexaggerated way and become even sicker than you would have if you had never been vaccinated. So, in other words, the v@ccine actually increases your risk of getting sick and dying.
Comments from Dr. Rowan below: Dr. Anthony Fauci has informed the public that these vaccines do not stop transmission. Therefore, the next dose of the viral proteins in the form of a natural infection for these study participants — a SARS-CoV-2 infection leading to COVID19 — may be their last. The study should be extended to long-term follow up, including any further vaccination or exposure to SARS-CoV-2 viral proteins by infection.
So why have the world’s top vaccine promoters, like Paul Offit and Peter Hotez, been warning us frantically about the unique and frightening dangers inherent in developing a coronavirus vaccine?
In this video footage, Offit, Hotez and even Fauci (in an unguarded moment), warn that any new coronavirus vaccine could trigger lethal immune reactions, “vaccine enhancement,” when vaccinated people come in contact with the wild virus. Instead of proceeding with caution, Fauci made the reckless choice to fast track vaccines, partially funded by Gates, without critical animal studies before moving into human clinical trials that could provide early warning of runaway immune responses.
Gates (in this video) is so worried about the danger of adverse events that he says vaccines shouldn’t be distributed until governments agree to indemnify against lawsuits. On Feb. 4, according to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) website, there were only 11 active CV cases in the U.S., yet the U.S. quietly pushed through federal regulations giving coronavirus vaccine makers full immunity from liability.
Are you willing to take the risk? Decide for yourself, based on the evidence.
Read these related studies:
2012 study: Immunization with SARS coronavirus vaccines leads to pulmonary immunopathology on challenge with the SARS virus.
2005 study: Openshaw PJ, Tregoning JS. Immune responses and disease enhancement during respiratory syncytial virus infection. Clin Microbiol Rev. 2005 Jul;18(3):541-55. doi: 10.1128/CMR.18.3.541-555.2005. PMID: 16020689; PMCID: PMC1195968.
It appears that the government has given vaccine makers immunity from lawsuits over the vaccine as they have for childhood vaccines. If I am reading it incorrectly, please let me know
Read the Emergency Declaration under the law:
Federal Register giving liability protection, The PREP Act”””
Sources:
https://childrenshealthdefense.org/.../pfizer-covid.../
Video:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lkGB1-YFn1Q&feature=emb_logo
https://m.facebook.com/story.php?story_fbid=2991800217589110&id=438026759633148
https://7thchakrafilms.com/watch-soon
https://www.cnbc.com/2020/12/16/covid-vaccine-side-effects-compensation-lawsuit.html
https://www.cvdvaccine-us.com/images/pdf/fact-sheet-for-hcp-administering-vaccine-vaccination-providers-full-eua-prescribing-information.pdf
https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/regulatory-approval-of-pfizer-biontech-vaccine-for-covid-19/information-for-healthcare-professionals-on-pfizerbiontech-covid-19-vaccine
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/health/article-9018547/Pfizer-CEO-not-certain-covid-shot-prevents-transmission.html
https://www.msn.com/en-us/health/medical/7-unanswered-questions-about-the-coronavirus-vaccines-from-pfizer-and-moderna/ar-BB1aQFgS
Insert:
https://www.fda.gov/media/144413/download
Keep informed: As per CDC website, as of Dec 18, -
of the 112,807 who received the COVID vax, 3150 are
“**unable to perform normal daily activities, unable to work, required care from doctor or health care professional”
Link: https://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/acip/meetings/downloads/slides-2020-12/slides-12-19/05-COVID-CLARK.pdf
That’s almost 3% 😳😡
https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMp2020926
My father Steve Kohn wrote this but I thought it would be appreciated here:
For those who are curious, here's where the "95%" effective vaccine number comes from. I'll explain this now. The vaccine is given in two doses. There were a little over 43,000 people in the trial, half of whom got the vaccine, half got the placebo. Within the first 7 days, 42% of more people caught COVID in the vaccine group compared with the placebo (page 42 of the report).
After the first shot, 1,588 vaccinated people got COVID, 1,654 placebo people got COVID. That's a 4% increase for the placebo group, which is statistically within anyone's margin of error.
The, for the second shot, they ELIMINATED the 3,242 people who already caught COVID during the trial from the math, and found that after the 2nd shot only 8 people from the vaccine group got COVID while 162 from the placebo group did.
THAT's where the 95% effective number comes from. BUT, overall, here's the score:
Vaccinated group: 1,594 cases
Placebo group: 1,816 cases
Is the vaccine effective? According to this data, yes, but....
13.9%....not 95%.
BUT, before you get excited about that, there are many more adverse reactions in the vaccine group than the placebo group.
Also, we don't know if the disease was prevented in the people who would otherwise die from it.
To me, the most interesting part of this report is that fact that almost 8% of people got COVID within 60 days. That's a gigantic number, but remember, this study tested EVERYONE regardless of symptoms. So, if 8% of the population got COVID in 60 days (440K people per day in the US) at a time when the US was reporting 50K cases per day (mostly October), then possibly 9 times the number of people reported have already caught it (with most not knowing so), which means that half of the country could already have already caught COVID. It also means that currently, where 250K cases are being reported daily, it could truly be over 2MM daily. The other thing it could mean is that the 3% death rate might actually be 1/3 of 1%.
In other words, it would appear that it's rapidly burning through the population right now and will wane over the course of the next year, vanishing completely. Pfizer will take the credit of course, but it's going to end all by itself anyway, and the vaccine might help 1/7 of the people who take it.
https://m.facebook.com/groups/VaccinationReEducationDiscussionForum/permalink/3913853412000811/
https://www.darksidevaccines.com/covid-19-vaccines-are-they-safe/
https://www.lifesitenews.com/news/pfizer-coronavirus-vaccine-not-safe-for-pregnant-or-breastfeeding-mums-potential-danger-for-fertility
a lawsuit to site when you deny the vax:
https://www.ini-world-report.org/2019/12/30/u-s-government-loses-landmark-lawsuit-over-forced-vaccinations/?fbclid=IwAR0opF9JoGs5J_QieANUfHSD2Ri5qJBbzXapr_2CBRUqgG4iAwS8ONYhz2A
https://www.thehealthyamerican.org/
https://m.facebook.com/story.php?story_fbid=10151470884014957&id=501599956
https://thehighwire.com/
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=KzpdaJgjh8c&feature=youtu.be
https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.nytimes.com/2020/12/18/us/eeoc-employers-coronavirus-mandate.amp.html
POSTING ANONYMOUSLY FOR A VALUED MEMBER
I know this is a super sore subject. Please ignore my ignorance. I am a COVID health care professional. Yesterday I received the vaccine. I thought if there’s anyone to get it, it should be me. I can be the experiment because if it could help further people then I’d be willing to deal with side effects. Well, they make you wait 15 minutes after receiving it. I passed the 15 minutes. 45 minutes later at work, I became extremely hot, sweaty, clammy, and tachycardic and confused and they called a condition and got me to the ER. What bothered me is how they pushed this off. They’re like oh it’s not the vaccine. It most certainly is. Don’t say it isn’t. And that’s FINE if it is but let me know how I can let the company know how to improve. So, if anyone works in healthcare.. or is thinking of getting it please discuss it first. I was in a life threatening situation. I won’t be getting it again simply for the fact at how it was handled. I shouldnt be shocked but here I am. Informed decisions. ✅ know your info. I was the 4th one to go down with the same symptoms at my hospital yesterday. Bad batch? I’m not sure.
Urgent warning from Dr Vernon Coleman on adverse health impacts from the Covid-19 vaccine, extract:
I have just seen a report from the Advisory Committee on Immunisation Practices Covid-19 Vaccine Work Group at the CDC.
This is a report on anaphylaxis following m-RNA Covid-19 vaccine receipt, and the report includes a table headed: 'V-Safe Active Surveillance for Covid-19 Vaccine'.
The table lists the number of registrants with a recorded first dose by December 18th as 112,807 and the number of Health Impact Events as 3,150.
Health Impact Events are defined as individuals, 'unable to perform normal daily activities, unable to work, required care from doctor or health professional'.
That is 2.79%, and it is within days of receiving the vaccine.
If 60 million people in the UK have the vaccine we can, therefore, expect 1.67 million people to be 'unable to work, perform normal daily activities and to require care from a doctor or health professional'.
And that is just the short-term effect of the vaccine. We obviously don’t know what will happen in the months and years ahead.
https://brandnewtube.com/watch/urgent-news-about-the-covid-19-vaccine_botqwzI8R7UUVY2.html
Exactly yes , to say nothing of the medium / long term consequences, millions of people will suffer from just the first dose!
heres the link to which he refers...
https://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/acip/meetings/downloads/slides-2020-12/slides-12-19/05-COVID-CLARK.pdf
https://www.bitchute.com/video/hZVs7lx1FWna/
Even Gavi acknowledges immunity from
Covid lasts : https://www.gavi.org/vaccineswork/natural-immunity-covid-19-may-be-long-lasting?fbclid=IwAR2ZfHW8_2SG1cGtJIWKuGpMFwRZkwCR692wr9qwNSxrU8qqrqL-ycSSQuI
https://www.facebook.com/WendyBellRadio/videos/1301356750220899/
https://www.facebook.com/425469784277406/posts/1719614054862966/
https://directorsblog.nih.gov/2020/07/28/immune-t-cells-may-offer-lasting-protection-against-covid-19/
Also this is a great video to watch. It’s an interview with Dr. Mike Yeadon who is the ex Vice President of Pfizer. It’s 32 minutes worth watching.
https://www.bitchute.com/video/p5hdVIhqu8HD/
https://medicalxpress.com/news/2020-10-sars-cov-antibodies-immunity.html
BUSTED🙌🙌🙌 straight from BMJ
But the truth is that the science remains far from clear cut, *even for influenza vaccines* that have been used for decades. Although randomized trials have shown an effect in reducing the risk of symptomatic influenza, *such trials have never been conducted in elderly people living in the community to see whether they save lives.*
Only two placebo controlled trials in this population have ever been conducted, and *neither was designed to detect any difference in hospital admissions or deaths.*23 *Moreover, dramatic *increases in use of influenza vaccines **has not been associated with a decline in mortality** (box 2).26
https://www.bmj.com/content/371/bmj.m4037
https://childrenshealthdefense.org/defender/pfizer-covid-vaccine-reaction-fda-peg/
https://www.bbc.com/news/amp/health-55244122
https://www.fda.gov/media/144245/download
https://www.sciencemag.org/news/2020/12/suspicions-grow-nanoparticles-pfizer-s-covid-19-vaccine-trigger-rare-allergic-reactions
Pfizer insert The Insert https://www.fda.gov/media/144413/download
Moderna report which includes what looks like the insert. Moderna FDA report https://www.fda.gov/media/144434/download
Pfizer Insert:
https://covid-vaccine.canada.ca/info/pdf/pfizer-biontech-covid-19-vaccine-pm1-en.pdf
Pfizer insert:
https://www.fda.gov/media/144413/download
Moderna insert:
https://www.fda.gov/media/144637/download
Sorry, my math isn't working today,
Evidence of Dangerous P@thogenic Priming
in older adults who receive the Covid v@ccine:
Pathogenic priming is when you take a v@ccine which "primes" or prepares you to mount an immune response later on when you are exposed to the invader (usually virus) again. Pathogenic priming means that when you see the invader again, you actually respond in a hyperexaggerated way and become even sicker than you would have if you had never been vaccinated. So, in other words, the v@ccine actually increases your risk of getting sick and dying.
Comments from Dr. Rowan below: Dr. Anthony Fauci has informed the public that these vaccines do not stop transmission. Therefore, the next dose of the viral proteins in the form of a natural infection for these study participants — a SARS-CoV-2 infection leading to COVID19 — may be their last. The study should be extended to long-term follow up, including any further vaccination or exposure to SARS-CoV-2 viral proteins by infection.
So why have the world’s top vaccine promoters, like Paul Offit and Peter Hotez, been warning us frantically about the unique and frightening dangers inherent in developing a coronavirus vaccine?
In this video footage, Offit, Hotez and even Fauci (in an unguarded moment), warn that any new coronavirus vaccine could trigger lethal immune reactions, “vaccine enhancement,” when vaccinated people come in contact with the wild virus. Instead of proceeding with caution, Fauci made the reckless choice to fast track vaccines, partially funded by Gates, without critical animal studies before moving into human clinical trials that could provide early warning of runaway immune responses.
Gates (in this video) is so worried about the danger of adverse events that he says vaccines shouldn’t be distributed until governments agree to indemnify against lawsuits. On Feb. 4, according to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) website, there were only 11 active CV cases in the U.S., yet the U.S. quietly pushed through federal regulations giving coronavirus vaccine makers full immunity from liability.
Are you willing to take the risk? Decide for yourself, based on the evidence.
Read these related studies:
2012 study: Immunization with SARS coronavirus vaccines leads to pulmonary immunopathology on challenge with the SARS virus.
2005 study: Openshaw PJ, Tregoning JS. Immune responses and disease enhancement during respiratory syncytial virus infection. Clin Microbiol Rev. 2005 Jul;18(3):541-55. doi: 10.1128/CMR.18.3.541-555.2005. PMID: 16020689; PMCID: PMC1195968.
It appears that the government has given vaccine makers immunity from lawsuits over the vaccine as they have for childhood vaccines. If I am reading it incorrectly, please let me know
Read the Emergency Declaration under the law:
Federal Register giving liability protection, The PREP Act”””
Sources:
https://childrenshealthdefense.org/.../pfizer-covid.../
Video:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lkGB1-YFn1Q&feature=emb_logo
https://m.facebook.com/story.php?story_fbid=2991800217589110&id=438026759633148
https://7thchakrafilms.com/watch-soon
https://www.cnbc.com/2020/12/16/covid-vaccine-side-effects-compensation-lawsuit.html
Info about the RNA ingrediant:
This is an RNA vaccine. It is the first messenger RNA vaccine [1] to be authorized in humans. So, this is definitely an experimental vaccine, intended for people aged 16 and over. The mRNA vaccine against Covid-19 requires a process whereby a strand of genetic code is administered by injection in order to create “spike proteins” as we find on the envelope of the SARS-CoV2 virus. The vaccine therefore teaches our immune system to recognize it if we just get it. This phenomenon is called the immune response, and it’s nothing really new. What is special about this vaccine is that in order for the mRNA to more easily penetrate our cells, it is enveloped in a kind of layer of lipid nanoparticles (fat).
This vaccination requires two doses of vaccine which must be administered within 21 days.
A messenger?
Our DNA hosts all the information necessary to build the proteins that our bodies need. DNA remains in the cell nucleus while protein manufacturing takes place outside and acts as a production plant outside the cell nucleus (cytoplasm). It is called a messenger since it transmits information from the cell nucleus to the cytoplasm. So, in other words, a copy of the DNA fragments, called RNA (ribonucleic acid).
Unlike other vaccines where we inject an inactive virus and virus proteins, here we inject a messenger RNA which will be processed and read by our body allowing our production plant to manufacture a piece of virus protein, as indicated above. The activity of the virus is therefore copied and thus promotes the production of antibodies. Also, this messenger RNA is produced synthetically from the genetic sequence of the virus.
Concerned experts
To date, since very few studies have been carried out and because of its development, which took place in historic record time, the arrival of this vaccine is causing many concerns among several renowned professionals and specialists [2], with regard to short-medium-long term effects. The same is true for a large part of the population.
Pr. Christian Perronne, a doctor who specializes in the field of infectious diseases and tropical pathology, is one of these experts. He wonders about the value of mass vaccination for a disease that has a lethality rate of around 0.05%. According to him this vaccination campaign is useless, especially since the associated risks could be far greater than the benefits themselves. In his open letter [3], Professor Perronne cautions that this could permanently change our genes since, by injecting foreign RNA into our body, it could encode as DNA. According to him, these genetic changes could be transmitted to our children through the eggs and sperm.
It should be noted that Professor Perronne is not typically against vaccination; quite the contrary. In 2004, he took part in research on a vaccine against the H5N1 virus (avian flu). He was also appointed head of the infectious diseases department at the Raymond-Poincaré hospital in Garches.
In 2009, he was Vice-President of the European Advisory Group of Experts on Immunization, which advises the European vaccine policy of the World Health Organization.
Among these experts, we also find Dr. Michael Yeadon, former director of research at Pfizer, Dr. Wolfgang Wodarg, German doctor Chistian Velot, molecular geneticist at the University of Paris-Saclay, Dr. Henrion-Claude, geneticist RNA specialist, to name just a few.
Known side effects
To date, very few studies have been conducted on the COVID-19 vaccine. Even less with regard to independent studies. That being said, here is a list of possible side effects and risks made public in an FDA report [4], Sponsored by Pfizer and BioNTech.
SIDE EFFECTS:
Pain at the injection site
Redness
Swelling
Fever
Fatigue
Headache
Chills
Vomiting
Diarrhea
New or worsening muscle pain
New or worsening joint pain
POSSIBLE SERIOUS SIDE EFFECTS (Subject to modification) [5]:
Guillain-Barré syndrome
Acute disseminated encephalomyelitis
Transverse myelitis
Encephalitis / myelitis / encephalomyelitis /
Meningoencephalitis / meningitis
Encephalopathy
Convulsions and seizures
Stroke
Narcolepsy and cataplexy
Anaphylaxis
Acute myocardial infarction
Myocarditis / pericarditis
Autoimmune disease
Death
Pregnancy and childbirth
Other acute demyelinating diseases
Non-anaphylactic allergic reactions
Thrombocytopenia
Disseminated intravascular coagulation
Venous thromboembolism
Arthritis and arthralgia / joint pain
Kawasaki disease (multisystem inflammatory syndrome in children, a disease reinforced by a vaccine)
Appendicitis
In addition, 4.6% of people in England who received the Pfizer coronavirus vaccine had very severe facial paralysis (Bell's palsy) [6] and lymph node impairment.
Moreover, as indicated in the same report, the administration of the second dose has been found to generate more marked side effects in a greater number of patients.
Non-clinical toxicology
According to Pfizer and BioNTech, it was not considered relevant to assess the carcinogenicity of the vaccine. The same goes for genotoxicity.
What is genotoxicity? It is the alteration of the genome of living things by a harmful substance or radiation.
“A substance (synthetic chemical or naturally genotoxic natural agent) or radiation are said to be genotoxic when they can compromise the physical (chromosomal breakage) or functional integrity of the genome.“
The chromosome, cell and organism have mechanisms for repairing DNA or removing mutant cells, but if repair is imperfect, incomplete, or absent, DNA damage leads to permanent and irreversible mutations (generally neutral or deleterious).
These mutations can affect individual genes (gene mutation), gene blocks (genomic mutation) or chromosomes (chromosomal mutation).
Depending on the severity of the mutation (or mutations), the genotoxic products can then in particular be the source of a deficiency transmitted to the offspring; and if they have mutated genes involved in cell proliferation and / or survival, may be the source of benign tumors and / or cancer.”
If we take into account the Professor Perronne’s assertions and the document (Expertise Note for the General Public on vaccines using GMO technologies) by Dr Velot [2.3], do you believe it is not pertinent to evaluate the genotoxicity of Pfizer & BioNTech Covid-19 mRNA vaccine?
Note also that the CEO of Pfizer, Albert Bourla, made the decision to wait to be vaccinated, and the same is true for all the Pfizer executives who will wisely wait their turn, as well. [7]
Same thing for French President Emmanuel Macron who does not intend to be vaccinated immediately [8] In addition, he does not intend to make vaccination compulsory since, according to him, we do not know much about this vaccine nor about this virus. [9]
One thing is certain, this vaccine is experimental, and populations around the world, are the primary guinea pigs.
This vaccination requires two doses of vaccine which must be administered within 21 days.
A messenger?
Our DNA hosts all the information necessary to build the proteins that our bodies need. DNA remains in the cell nucleus while protein manufacturing takes place outside and acts as a production plant outside the cell nucleus (cytoplasm). It is called a messenger since it transmits information from the cell nucleus to the cytoplasm. So, in other words, a copy of the DNA fragments, called RNA (ribonucleic acid).
Unlike other vaccines where we inject an inactive virus and virus proteins, here we inject a messenger RNA which will be processed and read by our body allowing our production plant to manufacture a piece of virus protein, as indicated above. The activity of the virus is therefore copied and thus promotes the production of antibodies. Also, this messenger RNA is produced synthetically from the genetic sequence of the virus.
Concerned experts
To date, since very few studies have been carried out and because of its development, which took place in historic record time, the arrival of this vaccine is causing many concerns among several renowned professionals and specialists [2], with regard to short-medium-long term effects. The same is true for a large part of the population.
Pr. Christian Perronne, a doctor who specializes in the field of infectious diseases and tropical pathology, is one of these experts. He wonders about the value of mass vaccination for a disease that has a lethality rate of around 0.05%. According to him this vaccination campaign is useless, especially since the associated risks could be far greater than the benefits themselves. In his open letter [3], Professor Perronne cautions that this could permanently change our genes since, by injecting foreign RNA into our body, it could encode as DNA. According to him, these genetic changes could be transmitted to our children through the eggs and sperm.
It should be noted that Professor Perronne is not typically against vaccination; quite the contrary. In 2004, he took part in research on a vaccine against the H5N1 virus (avian flu). He was also appointed head of the infectious diseases department at the Raymond-Poincaré hospital in Garches.
In 2009, he was Vice-President of the European Advisory Group of Experts on Immunization, which advises the European vaccine policy of the World Health Organization.
Among these experts, we also find Dr. Michael Yeadon, former director of research at Pfizer, Dr. Wolfgang Wodarg, German doctor Chistian Velot, molecular geneticist at the University of Paris-Saclay, Dr. Henrion-Claude, geneticist RNA specialist, to name just a few.
Known side effects
To date, very few studies have been conducted on the COVID-19 vaccine. Even less with regard to independent studies. That being said, here is a list of possible side effects and risks made public in an FDA report [4], Sponsored by Pfizer and BioNTech.
SIDE EFFECTS:
Pain at the injection site
Redness
Swelling
Fever
Fatigue
Headache
Chills
Vomiting
Diarrhea
New or worsening muscle pain
New or worsening joint pain
POSSIBLE SERIOUS SIDE EFFECTS (Subject to modification) [5]:
Guillain-Barré syndrome
Acute disseminated encephalomyelitis
Transverse myelitis
Encephalitis / myelitis / encephalomyelitis /
Meningoencephalitis / meningitis
Encephalopathy
Convulsions and seizures
Stroke
Narcolepsy and cataplexy
Anaphylaxis
Acute myocardial infarction
Myocarditis / pericarditis
Autoimmune disease
Death
Pregnancy and childbirth
Other acute demyelinating diseases
Non-anaphylactic allergic reactions
Thrombocytopenia
Disseminated intravascular coagulation
Venous thromboembolism
Arthritis and arthralgia / joint pain
Kawasaki disease (multisystem inflammatory syndrome in children, a disease reinforced by a vaccine)
Appendicitis
In addition, 4.6% of people in England who received the Pfizer coronavirus vaccine had very severe facial paralysis (Bell's palsy) [6] and lymph node impairment.
Moreover, as indicated in the same report, the administration of the second dose has been found to generate more marked side effects in a greater number of patients.
Non-clinical toxicology
According to Pfizer and BioNTech, it was not considered relevant to assess the carcinogenicity of the vaccine. The same goes for genotoxicity.
What is genotoxicity? It is the alteration of the genome of living things by a harmful substance or radiation.
“A substance (synthetic chemical or naturally genotoxic natural agent) or radiation are said to be genotoxic when they can compromise the physical (chromosomal breakage) or functional integrity of the genome.“
The chromosome, cell and organism have mechanisms for repairing DNA or removing mutant cells, but if repair is imperfect, incomplete, or absent, DNA damage leads to permanent and irreversible mutations (generally neutral or deleterious).
These mutations can affect individual genes (gene mutation), gene blocks (genomic mutation) or chromosomes (chromosomal mutation).
Depending on the severity of the mutation (or mutations), the genotoxic products can then in particular be the source of a deficiency transmitted to the offspring; and if they have mutated genes involved in cell proliferation and / or survival, may be the source of benign tumors and / or cancer.”
If we take into account the Professor Perronne’s assertions and the document (Expertise Note for the General Public on vaccines using GMO technologies) by Dr Velot [2.3], do you believe it is not pertinent to evaluate the genotoxicity of Pfizer & BioNTech Covid-19 mRNA vaccine?
Note also that the CEO of Pfizer, Albert Bourla, made the decision to wait to be vaccinated, and the same is true for all the Pfizer executives who will wisely wait their turn, as well. [7]
Same thing for French President Emmanuel Macron who does not intend to be vaccinated immediately [8] In addition, he does not intend to make vaccination compulsory since, according to him, we do not know much about this vaccine nor about this virus. [9]
One thing is certain, this vaccine is experimental, and populations around the world, are the primary guinea pigs.